Content deleted Content added
ShelfSkewed (talk | contribs) Removed maintenance template—link fixed |
sections in chronological order, per WP:TOPPOST |
||
Line 9:
}}
{{IEP assignment|project=India Education Project|course=Wikipedia:India Education Program/Courses/Fall 2011/Computer Organization and Advanced Microprocessing|ended=|university=Department of Electronics and Telecommunication, College of Engineering, Pune, India|term=2011 Q3}}
==ECC memory protection rates==▼
How can anyone deduce such error rates ("from 10<sup>-10</sup> to 10<sup>-17</sup>") for ECC modules based on the sigmetrics'09 paper [http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~bianca/papers/sigmetrics09.pdf]? I don't like statistics, but whichever the way I try, I obtain results orders of magnitude larger than this, more like 10<sup>-5</sup> per bit and per hour. Would anyone with enough confidence in their calculations point me to the correct line of reasoning? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/212.234.33.50|212.234.33.50]] ([[User talk:212.234.33.50|talk]]) 16:05, 24 February 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->▼
i am curious as to what is the current thinking is concerning soft-errors. first we hear it's alphas, then there's a comment about neutrons, then another comment about alphas again. this should be easy to test. [[User:Bob Emmett|Bob Emmett]] ([[User talk:Bob Emmett|talk]]) 07:17, 19 March 2010 (UTC)▼
==Requests==
Line 344 ⟶ 340:
==Feeling superior==
"superior to SDRAM in some ways" Such as? Also, I recall a 64Mb DRAM proposal, but don't see it mentioned. (Or did I miss it...?) [[User:Trekphiler|<font color="#1034A6"><small>TREKphiler</small></font>]] [[User talk:Trekphiler|<font color="#1034A6"><sup><small>hit me ♠</small> </sup>]]</font> 15:56, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
▲==ECC memory protection rates==
▲How can anyone deduce such error rates ("from 10<sup>-10</sup> to 10<sup>-17</sup>") for ECC modules based on the sigmetrics'09 paper [http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~bianca/papers/sigmetrics09.pdf]? I don't like statistics, but whichever the way I try, I obtain results orders of magnitude larger than this, more like 10<sup>-5</sup> per bit and per hour. Would anyone with enough confidence in their calculations point me to the correct line of reasoning? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/212.234.33.50|212.234.33.50]] ([[User talk:212.234.33.50|talk]]) 16:05, 24 February 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
▲:i am curious as to what is the current thinking is concerning soft-errors. first we hear it's alphas, then there's a comment about neutrons, then another comment about alphas again. this should be easy to test. [[User:Bob Emmett|Bob Emmett]] ([[User talk:Bob Emmett|talk]]) 07:17, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
== DRAM operation figures ==
| |||