Talk:Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:26, 30 December 2006

Revision as of 17:29, 30 December 2006

Line 1:

{{dated prod|concern = {{{concern|I believe this page was created in error. The original creator probably meant to make it a subpage of the talk page referenced instead of an article in the article namespace. I went ahead and created the subpage and copied this article into it.}}}|month = December|day = 28|year = 2006|time = 18:11|timestamp = 20061228181105}}

<!-- Do not use the "dated prod" template directly; the above line is generated by "subst:prod|reason" -->

The description of how this protocol actually works is woefully wrong, and seems to consist mostly of the Cisco marketing blather about how good it is. It is '''not''' in any way a link-state protocol, and does not have a complete topology map (even though the documentation speaks of "Topology Table" - which is basically just a copy of each neighbour's routing table). I did find one Cisco document that's reasonably technically accurate, and will reference it in the article. Are there actually any public-___domain specifications of the protocol that we can reference? I found one thing that's pretty reasonable, will add that too. [[User:Jnc|Noel]] [[User_talk:Jnc|(talk)]] 17:55, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)