Revision as of 01:52, 4 July 2020 edit Mdaniels5757 (talk \| contribs) Account creators, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, New page reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors 29,207 edits Assessment (Start): Computing, Computer science (Low) (Rater) ← Previous edit		Revision as of 04:15, 19 August 2020 edit undo 103.27.230.134 (talk) →Article is self-contradictory, lacks verifiability, uses vague, non-descriptive language and is written like an advertisement Next edit →
Line 36: ::Yes, the article is still contradictory. The very first sentence of the article states that the technology is deep learning technology "{{tq\|(DLSS) is a technology developed by Nvidia, using deep learning}}", where as the release history states that the "{{tq\|2.0 (first iteration)}}" does "{{tq\|not use machine learning}}", which [[Media:AI-ML-DL.png\|by definition includes deep learning]]. Also I would not propose deletion anymore. [[Special:Contributions/62.248.185.87\|62.248.185.87]] ([[User talk:62.248.185.87\|talk]]) 19:30, 30 May 2020 (UTC) ::As of now / after [[User:Dicklyon\|Dicklyon]]s revision 959815010 added "{{tq\|(in some versions)}}" to the article, it doesn't contradict itself, but I personally don't feel confident in removing the tags since I believe it will take a miracle for the remark to stay in the article for as long as until it can be clarified with a reliable and sourced reference and not just edit warred out of the article. I base this on the experience of how removing a single sentence entirely contradicted by it's citation out of this article got me character assassinated on my user talk and a mod talk page, how my revisions concerning 2716 word referenced article were undone seconds after making them while none of the concerns were or ever have been addressed, and worst of all these behaviors only lead to actions against me. [[Special:Contributions/62.248.185.87\|62.248.185.87]] ([[User talk:62.248.185.87\|talk]]) 21:07, 30 May 2020 (UTC) [[Special:Contributions/103.27.230.134\|103.27.230.134]] ([[User talk:103.27.230.134\|talk]]) 04:15, 19 August 2020 (UTC) DLSS 2.0 is still based on AI. What made the editor think DLSS 2.0 for Control doesn't use Deep Learning. It just says that DLSS 2.0 doesn't need specific training for each game. [[Special:Contributions/103.27.230.134\|103.27.230.134]] ([[User talk:103.27.230.134\|talk]]) 04:15, 19 August 2020 (UTC) == Contradictions fixes ==

Talk:Deep Learning Super Sampling: Difference between revisions