Content deleted Content added
m add another application example |
→Criticism: grammar |
||
Line 71:
* Shrinking bias: Since graph cuts finds a minimum cut, the algorithm can be biased toward producing a small contour.<ref>Ali Kemal Sinop and Leo Grady, "[http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.93.6438&rep=rep1&type=pdf A Seeded Image Segmentation Framework Unifying Graph Cuts and Random Walker Which Yields A New Algorithm]", Proc. of ICCV, 2007</ref> For example, the algorithm is not well-suited for segmentation of thin objects like blood vessels (see<ref>Vladimir Kolmogorov and Yuri Boykov (2005), "[http://pub.ist.ac.at/~vnk/papers/KB-ICCV05.pdf What Metrics Can Be Approximated by Geo-Cuts, or Global Optimization of Length/Area and Flux]", Proc. of ICCV pp. 564–571</ref> for a proposed fix).
* Multiple labels: Graph cuts is only able to find a global optimum for binary labeling (i.e., two labels) problems, such as foreground/background image segmentation. Extensions have been proposed that can find approximate solutions for multilabel graph cuts problems.<ref name="boykov2001fast" />
* Memory: the memory usage of graph cuts
== Algorithm ==
|