Open-loop controller: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 06:16, 19 May 2020

Revision as of 04:24, 25 August 2020

Line 24:

For example, an [[irrigation sprinkler]] system, programmed to turn on at set times could be an example of an open-loop system if it does not measure [[soil]] [[moisture]] as a form of feedback. Even if rain is pouring down on the lawn, the sprinkler system would activate on schedule, wasting water.

Another example is a [[Stepperstepper motor]]s used for control of position. Sending it a stream of electrical pulses causes it to rotate by exactly that many steps, hence the name. If the motor was always assumed to perform each movement correctly, without positional feedback, it would be open-loop control. However, if there is a position encoder, or sensors to indicate the "start" or finish positions, then that is closed-loop control, such as in many [[inkjet printer]]s. The drawback of open-loop control of steppers is that if the machine load is too high, or the motor attempts to move too quickly, then steps may be skipped. The controller has no means of detecting this and so the machine continues to run slightly out of adjustment until reset. For this reason, more complex robots and machine tools instead use [[servomotor]]s rather than stepper motors, which incorporate [[rotary encoder|encoder]]s and [[closed-loop controller]]s.

However, open-loop control is very useful and economic for well-defined systems where the relationship between input and the resultant state can be reliably modeled by a mathematical formula. For example, determining the [[voltage]] to be fed to an [[electric motor]] that drives a constant load, in order to achieve a desired [[speed]] would be a good application. But if the load were not predictable and became excessive, the motor's speed might vary as a function of the load not just the voltage, and an open-loop controller would be insufficient to ensure repeatable control of the velocity.