Revision as of 06:26, 6 November 2019 edit DannyS712 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 156,608 edits m DannyS712 moved page Module talk:Zh/Archive 3 to Module talk:Lang-zh/Archive 3 without leaving a redirect: requested move; consensus at Module talk:Lang-zh ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:36, 25 August 2020 edit undo AnomieBOT (talk \| contribs) Bots 6,862,908 edits m Substing templates: {{ISO 639 name zh-yue}} per WP:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 August 14#ISO 639 name from code templates. Report errors at User talk:AnomieBOT/TFDTemplateSubster. Next edit →
Line 17: You can make the case for 'zh-Latn' as both are cases of [[Chinese Romanisation]]. 'yue' is being used now in the sandbox and doesn't cause any problems but that doesn't mean it's being recognised, it may just being treated as unknown: {{lang\|yue\|Gwong²zau¹}} WP elsewhere uses 'zh-yue', e.g. in the barely used {{tl\|ISO 639 name zh-yue}} (which gives '{{ISO 639 name ~~zh-~~\|yue}}<!-- Cantonese -->'), but {{tlx\|lang\|zh-yue\|Gwong²zau¹}} has a similar problem to zh-latin, the browser seems not to recognise it and interprets it just zh so uses a Chinese font: {{lang\|zh-yue\|Gwong²zau¹}}. Looking at the yue entry on that list, 'yue' as a language own gives 'zh' as the macrolanguage, so maybe adding a script tag to one or both describes it better ** 'yue-Latn': {{lang\|yue-Latn\|Gwong²zau¹}}

Module talk:Lang-zh/Archive 3: Difference between revisions