Robustness validation: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:06, 31 July 2016

Revision as of 11:55, 30 August 2020

Line 1:

{{Multiple issues|{{refimprovemore citations needed|date=October 2012}}{{technical|date=October 2012}}

{{Orphan|date=December 2012}}

}}

Line 11:

The establishment of the Automotive Electronic Council ([[Automotive Electronics Council|AEC]]) 1994 by [[Ford]], [[Chrysler]], [[General Motors|GM]] - [[ACDelco|Delco]] was also the Starting point for the AEC-Q100 qualification process,<ref>Automotive Electronic Council's Stress Test Qualification for Integrated Circuits, AEC Q100, Rev. G, 2007, to [http://www.aecouncil.com/AECDocuments.html aecouncil.com]</ref> was based on the SAE standards.

Due to the development of [[automotive]] and the ever-increasing complexity of vehicles associated with the demands for lower error rates of this qualification process, this process to decide by nonspecific tests, to cover a wide range of possible failure mechanisms, but only on the functionality of the component is out of date. In order to make statements about the robustness AEC Q100 can be replaced robustness validation.

== Initiators and participants ==