Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Citrine (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Citrine (programming language): delete argument is misrepresenting deletion policy |
No edit summary |
||
Line 31:
*: The available references are not enough to write a good article using secondary resources. if the article topic is interesting and may become notable in the future, then writing a draft (using secondary resources, without COI) is the right thing to do for Wikipedia. I started this draft in August because the article topic is not notable enough for a Wikipedia article and the current article is written by the language author himself (COI). if you are interested in the article topic, you could help in improving this draft for the future until the article topic becomes ready for Wikipedia. [[Draft:Citrine_(programming_language)]] [[User:Charmk|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk|talk]]) 08:47, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
*::Unpaid CoI editing is only a delete rationale if the content fails the [[WP:TNT]] test. This is not remotely the case for this article: it has mild POV issues in a small number of sentences. Similarly, the GNG criterion sets a bar far below that required to ensure that we can write a good article; it ensures only that we can put together a nontrivial one. — [[User:Chalst|''Charles Stewart'']] <small>[[User_talk:Chalst|(talk)]]</small> 09:19, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
*:::Could those who want to keep this article perhaps just list the three best sources on which their argument for notability is based? After all, three good independent references to reliable sources is all we need. [[User:Charmk|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk|talk]]) 11:58, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' The article is written by user (Gabordemooij). The user name is identical to the language author (Gabor de Mooij) [[User:Charmk|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk|talk]]) 08:41, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
| |||