Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Citrine (programming language): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:33, 18 September 2020

Revision as of 22:48, 18 September 2020

Line 33:

*:::Could those who want to keep this article perhaps just list the three best sources on which their argument for notability is based? After all, three good independent references to reliable sources is all we need. [[User:Charmk|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk|talk]]) 11:58, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

*::::There are two independent sources in the article. Additionally, there's a paper from a conference on education programming that has a passing mention of Citrine: "Probably the most interesting approach to the problem of programming language localization is the one introduced in Citrine, version 0.7, whose vocabulary is automatically translated between natural languages [5]." (Jakub Swacha, 2002. Polish Python: A Short Report from a Short Experiment. In First International Computer Programming Education Conference (ICPEC 2020), ed. Ricardo Queirós, Filipe Portela, Mário Pinto and Alberto Simões. OASICS Vol. 81) [https://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2020/12312/pdf/OASIcs-ICPEC-2020-25.pdf]. Per guidelines, the case for notability is in the grey zone; I !vote keep due because I think we can get an acceptable article out of what we have, one that is verifiable, neutral, maintainable, and of encyclopedic interest. &mdash; [[User:Chalst|''Charles Stewart'']] <small>[[User_talk:Chalst|(talk)]]</small> 17:33, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

*::::: Ok, I agree with you, Also we relax our inclusion criteria for free & open source per [[WP:NSOFT#Reliability and significance of sources]]. [[User:Charmk|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk|talk]]) 22:48, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

*'''Comment''' The article is written by user (Gabordemooij). The user name is identical to the language author (Gabor de Mooij) [[User:Charmk|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk|talk]]) 08:41, 18 September 2020 (UTC)