Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Citrine (programming language): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:48, 18 September 2020

Revision as of 15:27, 26 September 2020

Line 34:

*::::There are two independent sources in the article. Additionally, there's a paper from a conference on education programming that has a passing mention of Citrine: "Probably the most interesting approach to the problem of programming language localization is the one introduced in Citrine, version 0.7, whose vocabulary is automatically translated between natural languages [5]." (Jakub Swacha, 2002. Polish Python: A Short Report from a Short Experiment. In First International Computer Programming Education Conference (ICPEC 2020), ed. Ricardo Queirós, Filipe Portela, Mário Pinto and Alberto Simões. OASICS Vol. 81) [https://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2020/12312/pdf/OASIcs-ICPEC-2020-25.pdf]. Per guidelines, the case for notability is in the grey zone; I !vote keep due because I think we can get an acceptable article out of what we have, one that is verifiable, neutral, maintainable, and of encyclopedic interest. &mdash; [[User:Chalst|''Charles Stewart'']] <small>[[User_talk:Chalst|(talk)]]</small> 17:33, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

*::::: Ok, I agree with you, Also we relax our inclusion criteria for free & open source per [[WP:NSOFT#Reliability and significance of sources]]. [[User:Charmk|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk|talk]]) 22:48, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

*:::::{{u|Chalst}}, after InfoWorld, what is the second independent source? ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 15:27, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

*'''Comment''' The article is written by user (Gabordemooij). The user name is identical to the language author (Gabor de Mooij) [[User:Charmk|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk|talk]]) 08:41, 18 September 2020 (UTC)