Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Citrine (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Citrine (programming language): Replying to Chalst (using reply-link) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 35:
*::::: Ok, I agree with you, Also we relax our inclusion criteria for free & open source per [[WP:NSOFT#Reliability and significance of sources]]. [[User:Charmk|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk|talk]]) 22:48, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
*:::::{{u|Chalst}}, after InfoWorld, what is the second independent source? ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 15:27, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
*:::::{{u|Kvng}}, According to my understanding, He means this reference [https://jaxenter.com/citrine-a-new-all-purpose-programming-language-for-unixoid-systems-123558.html] jaxenter doesn't have a Wikipedia article (not notable) but he says it's a reliable source, the question is "Could we accept this type of sources because Citrine is an open-source project?" [[User:Charmk|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk|talk]]) 16:39, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' The article is written by user (Gabordemooij). The user name is identical to the language author (Gabor de Mooij) [[User:Charmk|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk|talk]]) 08:41, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
| |||