Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Citrine (programming language): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
→Citrine (programming language): Replying to Charmk (using reply-link) |
||
Line 36:
*:::::{{u|Chalst}}, after InfoWorld, what is the second independent source? ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 15:27, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
*:::::{{u|Kvng}}, According to my understanding, He means this reference [https://jaxenter.com/citrine-a-new-all-purpose-programming-language-for-unixoid-systems-123558.html] jaxenter doesn't have a Wikipedia article (not notable) but he says it's a reliable source, the question is "Could we accept this type of sources because Citrine is an open-source project?" [[User:Charmk|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk|talk]]) 16:39, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
*::::::{{u|Charmk}}, that looks acceptable to me. I don't think open source needs to factor into it. ~[[User:Kvng|Kvng]] ([[User talk:Kvng|talk]]) 16:50, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' The article is written by user (Gabordemooij). The user name is identical to the language author (Gabor de Mooij) [[User:Charmk|Charmk]] ([[User talk:Charmk|talk]]) 08:41, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
| |||