Classification theorem: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Adding short description: "Describes the objects of a given type, up to some equivalence" (Shortdesc helper)
top: fix grammar; require def.n; rm redundant link
Line 3:
In [[mathematics]], a '''classification theorem''' answers the classification problem "What are the objects of a given type, up to some equivalence?". It gives a non-redundant enumeration: each object is equivalent to exactly one class.
 
A few related issues related to classification are the following.
 
*The equivalence problem is "given two objects, determine if they are equivalent".
*A [[complete set of invariants]], together with which invariants are {{clarify span|realizable,|reason=This notion should be introduced.}} solves the classification problem, and is often a step in solving it.
*A computable [[complete set of invariants]] (together with which invariants are realizable) solves both the classification problem and the equivalence problem.
* A [[canonical form]] solves the classification problem, and is more data: it not only classifies every class, but provides a distinguished (canonical) element of each class.