Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greatest chess player of all time: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 14:
'''Comment''' on the comment above: I think it is a good idea to change the title, and put in "considered" as suggested above. [[User:Bubba73|Bubba73]] [[User talk:Bubba73|(talk)]], 14:44, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
*'''Very strong keep.''' I have personal familiarity with this topic, although I had not seen this article before. It is a notable subject among chess players and fans. Among the several hundred articles in the Chess category and its subcategories, this one certainly belongs. The first part of the article reads like an essay, but the later part about computer analysis of human moves comes from a chessbase.com article, which I think is cited, and the chessbase.com article in turn cites an article from the ICGA Journal, a serious scholarly publication specializing in chess and other computer games. I would recommend some cleanup. Perhaps the title should be changed to "Historical Ranking of Chess Players," and the article will begin by explaining why such intergenerational rankings are difficult, then it will go into the greatest player ever debate. [[User:YechielMan|YechielMan]] 17:15, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
|