Content deleted Content added
→GA Review: continuation of review |
→GA Review: review and putting on hold |
||
Line 35:
;Later years and Special Marriage Act
* {{tq|The Hindu code bill failed to control the prevalent gender discrimination.}} Please address the generalisation.
;Significance of Shah Bano case
* {{tq|It further recommended that a uniform civil code be set up.}} Please confirm that the reference that backs up this line actually cover this.
* Citation 11 (Lawrence & Karim 2007, p. 262–264.) is used multiple times. However the page numbers mentioned p. 262–264 do not cover all the text referenced. Some of the content clearly spills over into p. 265.
* Jaffar Sharief can be linked.
* This phrasing or terminology "Muslim Women law" has not been used previously in the article. Please change accordingly.
;Current status and opinions
* Please make the date format throughout the article consistent. Currently I can see both DDMMYY and MMDDYY. The date template at the top is dmy.
* Please fix the page numbering in citation 27 (Chavan & Kidwai 2006, p. 13–20.). Page 19 is a section divider page and Page 20 in blank.
* Why does it say only {{tq|According to Qutub Kidwai}} and not Nandini Chavan as well?
* What is being referred to here? {{tq|This cannot be accepted}}. Please give this quote some more context or remove "this".
* This can be linked — Law Commission of India.
* Please copyedit the entire last paragraph and fix detailing of citations. {{tq|Indian society in [...] Indian society in }}
;Legal status and prospects
* Please make sure this is referenced {{tq|[...] included in BJP's manifesto for 1998 and 2019 elections [...]}}
;External links
* Please format external links correctly.
;Images
* Both seem ok
;References
* This book is in the bibliography — [Larson, Gerald James, ed. (2001), Religion and Personal Law in Secular India] — but I don't see it being used in the article. Please shift to further reading if not cited.
;Spelling
* Please make usage of Uniform Civil Code/uniform civil code consistent. All capital letters or all small letters?
;Copyright
* Earwigs catches two references for copyright — [https://fansfullpac.netlify.app/uniform-civil-code-in-goa-pdf.html 1] & [https://www.academia.edu/12113250 2]. These have been checked against the history of the article. They are a case of text being copied from Wikipedia.
[[User:DiplomatTesterMan|DTM]] ([[User talk:DiplomatTesterMan|talk]]) 08:00, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
{{GAProgress | prose = n| mos = n| reflayout = n| reliablesources = y| originalresearch = neu
| copyvio = neu| broadness = neu | focus = neu| neutral = y| stable = neu| freeortaggedpics = y
| picsrelevant = neu}}
I have reviewed the article and notified the nominator of the same. Currently I will put this review on hold for seven days for changes. I will give it a fresh review after '''21 October 2020'''.
[[User:DiplomatTesterMan|DTM]] ([[User talk:DiplomatTesterMan|talk]]) 06:52, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
| |||