Implicate and explicate order: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Nikkanik (talk | contribs)
Implicate order in art: Corrected punctuation (i.e., added commas)
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Nikkanik (talk | contribs)
Challenges to some generally prevailing views: Corrected spelling for consistency with sections above
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 69:
In proposing this new notion of order, [[David Bohm|Bohm]] explicitly challenged a number of tenets that he believed are fundamental to much scientific work:
 
# that phenomena are reducible to [[fundamental particles]] and [[Law (principle)|laws]] describing the [[behaviour]] of particles, or more generally to any static (i.e., unchanging) entities, whether separate events in [[space-timespacetime]], [[quantum states]], or static entities of some other nature;
# related to (1), that human knowledge is ''most fundamentally'' concerned with [[mathematical]] prediction of [[statistical]] aggregates of particles;
# that an analysis or description of any aspect of [[reality]] (e.g., quantum theory, the speed of light) can be unlimited in its [[Field of study|___domain]] of relevance;