Content deleted Content added
→I would like to merge a Holomorphically convex hull into some complex variables: tone down response a bit |
→I would like to merge a Holomorphically convex hull into some complex variables: Sign, sorry I'm off today |
||
Line 64:
:I continue to hold this page should not exist and may one day go through RfC or AfD to get consensus behind that. It does not truly meet notability requirements in its current form: The intro is incorrect. Complex analysis is not limited to a single variable, studies of functions of one or more complex variables falls squarely in the realm of complex analysis and no reliable source will say otherwise. Does anyone have a source that says complex analysis is of a different character than the theory of several complex variables? That is <s>an inexcusable instance of</s> original research. So is the entirety of the historical perspectives section. <s>Yes, the special case of single variables makes certain things easier, that does not mean they are different, and if they were different, why wouldn't it be functions of single complex variables that gets its own page? It is certainly way more notable.</s> All of the [[complex analysis]] article, outside the lead and intro, should be about multiple variables with a section on the ''special case'' of functions of a single complex variable, given Wikipedia is not a textbook but an encyclopedia. That being said, absorbing Holomorphically convex hull would not change anything, as that page is a stub, I have no problems with it. [[User:Footlessmouse|Footlessmouse]] ([[User talk:Footlessmouse|talk]]) 08:25, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
::Note, I struck some content out to tone down my response. Also, I realize that you did not object to my merge request, but I found it odd no one else joined in. [[User:Footlessmouse|Footlessmouse]] ([[User talk:Footlessmouse|talk]]) 08:54, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
| |||