Wikipedia:User scripts/Requests/Archive 4: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Line 358:
:{{u|SandyGeorgia}}, Indeed that indicated an underlying problem: the script wasn't configured to deal with "actionN" where N was a 2 digit number. Fixed it and re-run. Also moved it to project space. – [[User:SD0001|<span style="font-weight: bold; color: green">SD0001</span>]] ([[User talk:SD0001|talk]]) 22:51, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
:: Awesome, we are all set if anyone wants to archive this. [[User:SandyGeorgia|'''Sandy'''<span style="color: green;">Georgia</span>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 23:35, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
{{Clear}}
== Good article reassessment script ==
The process to nominate an article for good article reassessment is very time consuming and rather complicated (see the procedure laid out at [[Wikipedia:Good article reassessment]]), and I'd imagine that a script could automate this. Might be better as a [[WP:TW|twinkle]] feature{{em dash}} not sure{{em dash}}but here's my (with no coding experience) idea: an option to nominate it for individual or community reassessment, based upon what is selected the script will create the correct subpage. Then there could be a spot to type in the rationale and ideally the script would notify the original ga nominator and the original reviewer and any wikiprojects tagged on the talk. In my mind this would be like a combination of how twinkle handles XfD's and merge discussions, not sure how hard it would be to do, but as I anticipate nominating a lot of poor quality articles for reassessment soon, it could be very helpful. Best wishes, [[User:Eddie891|Eddie891]] <small>''<sup> [[User talk:Eddie891|Talk]]</sup> <sub>[[Special:Contributions/Eddie891|Work]]</sub>'' </small> 16:31, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
:Noting that this was {{done}} ([[User:SD0001/GAR-helper]]). See [[WT:TW#Good article reassessments]]. [[User:SD0001|SD0001]] ([[User talk:SD0001|talk]]) 09:38, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
| |||