Revision as of 17:28, 7 January 2007 edit David Levy (talk \| contribs) Administrators 45,230 edits →Alternate proposal: replies ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:50, 7 January 2007 edit undo Peter M Dodge (talk \| contribs) 4,982 edits Reply to David Levy Next edit →
Line 230: :How about you, Xaosflux? Did ''you'' read my replies? I don't understand why my argument that we should refer to the discussion as something other than an "RfA" has continually been construed as an argument that there should be no discussion. —[[User:David Levy\|David Levy]] 17:28, 7 January 2007 (UTC) :*It is simple: Wikipedia is built on community consensus. RFA is the proper forum for consensus regarding sysop functions. if you want a bot to pass, you must satisify conditions laid out by the BAG. if you do not, then it will not be approved. A condition of this bot's acceptance is passing RFA. Full stop. Cheers, ✎ <span style="font-family: Verdana">[[User:Wizardry Dragon\|<font color="#696">Peter M Dodge</font>]] ( [[User_talk:Wizardry_Dragon\|<font color="#696">Talk to Me</font>]] • [[WP:WNP\|<font color="#696">Neutrality Project</font>]] )</span> 17:50, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Bots/Requests for approval/ProtectionBot: Difference between revisions