Wikipedia talk:Bots/Requests for approval/ProtectionBot: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:15, 7 January 2007

Revision as of 19:00, 7 January 2007

Line 236:

:::2. "Because we said so" is ''not'' a legitimate argument for why something is right. Jimbo himself doesn't apply such logic. Furthermore, your "full stop" remark was rather rude.

:::3. I'm still waiting for you to elucidate your claim that "we dont have a +sysop in metawiki all that there currently is is +admin some can call it sysop but it is not." Again, if I'm missing something, please bring it to my attention. —[[User:David Levy|David Levy]] 18:15, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

::::* The right is called sysop. A bot cannot be an administrator. It can be a sysop. RFA is where you go to get the sysop bit. A bot op that wants the sysop bit for his or her bot should petition there. Until there is a seperate venue for bots, that is the way it should and will be. Cheers, ✎ <span style="font-family: Verdana">[[User:Wizardry Dragon|<font color="#696">Peter M Dodge</font>]] ( [[User_talk:Wizardry_Dragon|<font color="#696">Talk to Me</font>]] &bull; [[WP:WNP|<font color="#696">Neutrality Project</font>]] )</span> 19:00, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

::I did read your replies, I simply do not feel that there is a community support to allow the bot approvals group to approve the sysop flag to accounts; should the community support that, I would not have a problem exercising it. — [[User:Xaosflux|<b><font color="#FF9933" face="monotype"><big>xaosflux</big></font></b>]] ^{[[User_talk:Xaosflux|<font color="#00FF00">Talk</font>]]} 18:04, 7 January 2007 (UTC)