Revision as of 20:12, 7 January 2007 edit Peter M Dodge (talk \| contribs) 4,982 edits Reply to David Levy →Alternate proposal ← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:20, 7 January 2007 edit undo Newyorkbrad (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 45,896 edits Current status question Next edit →
Line 247: :::Are you certain that you read my replies? I never said that we should "allow the bot approvals group to approve the sysop flag to accounts." Over and over again, I've plainly stated that I don't object to the idea of conducting a formal discussion to determine community consensus. I object to the idea of labeling said discussion an "RfA" (because bots can't be admins). I'm merely arguing that the discussion should be called something different and held on a different page (while still prominently linked from RfA and various other forums). That's all. —[[User:David Levy\|David Levy]] 18:15, 7 January 2007 (UTC) == Current status question == (cross-posted to the RfA page) With the RfA now pending, is ProtectionBot currently operating during the RfA period? I hope that it is, at least on an ongoing trial basis. [[User:Newyorkbrad\|Newyorkbrad]] 20:20, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Bots/Requests for approval/ProtectionBot: Difference between revisions