Content deleted Content added
Silvermatsu (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 62:
:From my experience, having taken only a single class in the subject as an undergrad, "complex analysis" is precisely defined by the second half of the DAB statement as "the branch of mathematical analysis that investigates functions of complex numbers", i.e. functions with at least one complex argument. My opinion on this is, lacking textbook consensus saying otherwise, unwaiverable. Though others may disagree and I do not own the page. From a pure linguistic point of view, it really doesn't make any sense to reserve "complex analysis" for the "study of functions of a single variable that is complex", it's too narrow of a field for such a broad term. [[User:Footlessmouse|Footlessmouse]] ([[User talk:Footlessmouse|talk]]) 07:46, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
::{{Ping|Footlessmouse}} Thank you for teaching me. If complex analysis is a branch of function (analysis) theory to complex numbers, I think it is clearer to say complex analysis. I also agree with your idea, as I think it's too narrow to limit to one variable. I think the complex analysis template theorem is too close to one variable. Where do you think you should talk? Thanks!--[[User:SilverMatsu|SilverMatsu]] ([[User talk:SilverMatsu|talk]]) 10:10, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
:::Sorry, I'm not sure what you mean with your last statement and question. Randomly, though, I found this that may actually help both of us understand better. [https://www.jstor.org/stable/2323391 article on JSTOR titled "What is several complex variables"] by [[Steven G. Krantz]]. Because he is an established expert and it is published in a reliable source, you can use that as a reference when talking about the differences. [[User:Footlessmouse|Footlessmouse]] ([[User talk:Footlessmouse|talk]]) 11:16, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
== I found a page that may be related to this page ==
| |||