Sentence processing: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Marquise7 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
Add: doi, s2cid. Upgrade ISBN10 to ISBN13. | You can use this bot yourself. Report bugs here. | Suggested by Abductive | All pages linked from cached copy of User:Abductive/sandbox | via #UCB_webform_linked 50/997
Line 5:
 
==Ambiguity==
Sentence comprehension has to deal with ambiguity<ref>{{cite journal|last=Altmann|first=Gerry|title=Ambiguity in sentence processing|journal=Trends in Cognitive Sciences|date=April 1998|volume=2|issue=4|pages=146–151|doi=10.1016/s1364-6613(98)01153-x|pmid=21227111|s2cid=12113211}}</ref> in spoken and written utterances, for example [[Ambiguity|lexical]], [[Syntactic ambiguity|structural]], and [[semantic ambiguity|semantic ambiguities]]. Ambiguity is ubiquitous, but people usually resolve it so effortlessly that they do not even notice it. For example, the sentence ''[[Time flies like an arrow]]'' has (at least) the interpretations ''Time moves as quickly as an arrow'', ''A special kind of fly, called time fly, likes arrows'' and ''Measure the speed of flies like you would measure the speed of an arrow''. Usually, readers will be aware of only the first interpretation. Educated readers though, spontaneously think about the [[arrow of time]] but inhibit that interpretation because it deviates from the original phrase and the temporal lobe acts as a switch.
Instances of ambiguity can be classified as '''local''' or '''global''' ambiguities. A sentence is globally ambiguous if it has two distinct interpretations. Examples are sentences like ''Someone shot the servant of the actress who was on the balcony'' (was it the servant or the actress who was on the balcony?) or ''The cop chased the criminal with a fast car'' (did the cop or the criminal have a fast car?). Comprehenders may have a preferential interpretation for either of these cases, but syntactically and semantically, neither of the possible interpretations can be ruled out.
Line 59:
 
===Computational modeling===
Computational modeling is another means by which to explore language comprehension. Models, such as those instantiated in [[neural networks]], are particularly useful because they requires theorists to be explicit in their hypotheses and because they can be used to generate accurate predictions for theoretical models that are so complex that they render [[discursive psychology|discursive analysis]] unreliable. A classic example of computational modeling in language research is [[James McClelland (psychologist)|McClelland]] and [[Jeff Elman|Elman's]] [[Trace (psycholinguistics)|TRACE]] model of speech perception.<ref>{{cite journal | last1 = McClelland | first1 = J.L. | last2 = Elman | first2 = J.L. | year = 1986 | title = The TRACE model of speech perception | journal = Cognitive Psychology | volume = 18 | issue = 1| pages = 1–86 | doi = 10.1016/0010-0285(86)90015-0 | pmid = 3753912 | s2cid = 7428866 }}</ref> A model of sentence processing can be found in Hale (2011)'s 'rational' Generalized Left Corner parser.<ref>{{Cite journal | doi=10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01145.x| title=What a Rational Parser Would do| journal=Cognitive Science| volume=35| issue=3| pages=399–443| year=2011| last1=Hale| first1=John T.}}</ref> This model derives garden path effects as well as local coherence phenomena. Computational modeling can also help to relate sentence processing to other functions of language. For example, one model of ERP effects in sentence processing (e.g., N400 and P600) argues that these phenomena arise out learning processes that support language acquisition and linguistic adaptation.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Fitz|first1=Hartmut|last2=Chang|first2=Franklin|date=2019-06-01|title=Language ERPs reflect learning through prediction error propagation|journal=Cognitive Psychology|volume=111|pages=15–52|doi=10.1016/j.cogpsych.2019.03.002|pmid=30921626|hdl=21.11116/0000-0003-474D-8|s2cid=85501792|issn=0010-0285|hdl-access=free}}</ref>
 
==See also==
Line 95:
| year = 1999
| publisher = Cambridge University Press
| doi = 10.1017/CBO9780511527210.004
| url = https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4861/9eba4550b341eb95eeb208f8d16487fdd2fa.pdf}}
| s2cid = 16789862
| url = https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4861/9eba4550b341eb95eeb208f8d16487fdd2fa.pdf}}
* [http://sites.google.com/site/sentenceprocessing Human Sentence Processing]: an introductory website on the computational psycholinguistic aspects of human sentence processing, developed for students in Linguistics, Psychology or Computer Science.