Content deleted Content added
Megaman en m (talk | contribs) →History: While interesting, this is still a primary source, we'd need a secondary source to establish notability. |
m Task 18 (cosmetic): eval 15 templates: del empty params (4×); hyphenate params (1×); del |ref=harv (3×); |
||
Line 43:
== History ==
Throughout the 19th century, differential complexity was taken for granted. The classical languages [[Latin]] and [[Greek language|Greek]], as well as [[Sanskrit]], were considered to possess qualities which could be achieved by the rising European [[national language]]s only through an elaboration that would give them the necessary structural and lexical complexity that would meet the requirements of an advanced civilization. At the same time, languages described as 'primitive' were naturally considered to reflect the simplicity of their speakers.<ref name="Joseph2012" /><ref>{{Cite book|last=Arkadiev|first=Peter|url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/1197563838|title=The complexities of morphology|last2=Gardani|first2=Francesco
=== Equal complexity hypothesis ===
Line 79:
| ___location = Oxford
| publisher = Oxford University Press
| year = 2014
| isbn = 9780199685301}}</ref>{{Page needed|date=December 2016}} As to date, there have been research projects on language complexity, and several workshops for researchers have been organised by various universities.<ref name="Miestamo2008" />
Line 121 ⟶ 120:
==Bibliography==
{{refbegin}}
*{{cite book
*{{cite book
*{{cite book
*{{cite book | last = Sampson | first = Geoffrey | title = Language Complexity as an Evolving Variable | publisher = Oxford University Press | ___location = Oxford Oxfordshire | year = 2009 | isbn = 978-0-19-954522-3 }}
{{refend}}
|