Talk:Oracle bone script: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Line 111:
 
::AS1987, Please see my response to your (rather uncivil) comment on my talk page. <small><b><span style="border:1px solid;background:#030303"><span style="color:white">&nbsp;White&nbsp;Whirlwind&nbsp;</span>[[User talk:White_whirlwind|<span style="color:#030303;background-color:white;">&nbsp;咨&nbsp;</span>]]</span></b></small> 01:58, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
 
== Shouldn't Tao wen be the oldest chinese writing? ==
 
The article of Oracle Bone Script is a bit strange. Shouldn't Tao wen be the oldest chinese writing?
Here is my reason on why it should be:
According to Baidu and Chinese Wikipedia (Yes I know chinese) Tao wen(I don't know if it is really called like that) is the oldest chinese writing.
It clearly shows that the writing was made 4500 years ago (2500 BC) while Oracle Bone script was just made around 1250 BC to 1200 BC.
I don't know if I'm correct or not, but I should be.
 
Thanks,
[[User:10Jasejustestingzapppp|10Jasejustestingzapppp]] ([[User talk:10Jasejustestingzapppp|talk]]) 08:39, 28 December 2020 (UTC)