Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Addnode Group: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Creating deletion discussion page for Addnode Group. |
No edit summary |
||
Line 9:
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Blablubbs|Blablubbs]]<nowiki>|</nowiki>[[User talk:Blablubbs|talk]] 12:21, 29 December 2020 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Sweden|list of Sweden-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Blablubbs|Blablubbs]]<nowiki>|</nowiki>[[User talk:Blablubbs|talk]] 12:21, 29 December 2020 (UTC)</small>
I have discussed improvements in the Teahouse as well as with reviewers. I got the suggestion to add "Stub" to the article, which I did and therefore moved it to mainspace again. Please point me in the right direction if I am mismanaging this, but I do not think the stub should be "moved for deletion" I see many similar stub articles with maybe only the company webpage as reference. For reference look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Swedish_company_stubs. I assume the stub tag is included for this reason. I have included multplie references in addition to the company's annual report for exapmle. As for notability, the company is no Apple or Microsoft, but it a rather large company in Sweden employing around 1,600 people all over Europe. Again for reference, one can compare it to the other companies in the Swedish stub category.
Lastly I think the stub article is written in a a factual manner based on publicly available information. I have complied with disclosure requirements of wikipedia.[[User:Gustav Addnode|Gustav Addnode]] ([[User talk:Gustav Addnode|talk]]) 12:39, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
| |||