Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Addnode Group: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 12:59, 29 December 2020

Revision as of 13:25, 29 December 2020

Line 15:

:@[[User:Gustav Addnode|Gustav Addnode]], it was explicitly [[Special:Diff/995608854|pointed out to you]] that given your status as a disclosed paid editor, you should be submitting articles through AfC, as is [[WP:COIEDIT|considered]] best practice; you still decided to move it back to mainspace three times, which essentially constitutes move warring. As for notability, it is only determined by significant coverage in independent, reliable sources{{snd}}if the references don't establish this, the article cannot be included. It's true that we have lots of company articles that don't establish notability, but that is [[WP:OTHERSTUFF|not an argument]] for adding another one to that list. Finally, a stub tag does not impact the notability requirements and I don't read the [[Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive_1088#Addnode_Group_(improve_draft)|teahouse comments]] as a suggestion to add one and then move to mainspace. Best, [[User:Blablubbs|Blablubbs]]<nowiki>|</nowiki>[[User talk:Blablubbs|talk]] 12:59, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

I was advised to add the stub tag, not explicitly move it to mainspace afterwards. I can see that I misunderstood this, as I thought that the stub tag implied "WIP" and didnt need to go thorugh that process. I am new to Wiki and still learing. The correct thing would have been to add the tag, and then submitted it through AfC again. Again, as for notability, there is coverage in independent adn reliable sources - and as you stated, maybe someone with knowledge in Swedish can help evaluate/confirm this. So, instead of deleting a factual article, moving it to AfC with the stub tag might be the best way forward? Thanks for taking the time to discuss and help with the article.[[User:Gustav Addnode|Gustav Addnode]] ([[User talk:Gustav Addnode|talk]]) 13:25, 29 December 2020 (UTC)