Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Addnode Group: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→Addnode Group: Reply |
No edit summary |
||
Line 23:
:::#is another announcement
:::In short, I don't see anything here that is sufficient to establish notability, I'm afraid. [[User:Blablubbs|Blablubbs]]<nowiki>|</nowiki>[[User talk:Blablubbs|talk]] 19:14, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
OK! The sources are similar to other company pages (which, I agree, does not have to mean that they are independent/notable). However I think that the combination of articles , interviews and some public company information is a solid base for this stub article. It provides useful information but lacks the breadth and coverage expected from an "full" wiki article - for that reason it should be classified as a stub. According to wiki guidlines a stub should only be deleted if it has little verifiable information, or if its subject has no apparent notability - which i do not think applies to the discussed article. On your sidenote, I was refering to that specific comment "stub may be all that is possible", which implies that a stub is a suitable form of the article. As for the WIP, that was my own interpretation of the word in the context. Thanks for the clarification about the voting process.[[User:Gustav Addnode|Gustav Addnode]] ([[User talk:Gustav Addnode|talk]]) 20:29, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
| |||