Local development framework: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 06:45, 5 September 2020

Revision as of 10:48, 2 January 2021

Line 50:

*[[Simplified planning zone]]s

Sometimes certain policies from an old document remain effective when that document is superseded. These policies are known as "saved" policies.<ref>Elmbridge Council, {{cite web|url=http://www.elmbridge.gov.uk/planning/policy/localplan.htm |title=Archived copy |accessdateaccess-date=2015-07-16 |url-status=dead |archiveurlarchive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150717190026/http://www.elmbridge.gov.uk/planning/policy/localplan.htm |archivedatearchive-date=2015-07-17 }}</ref>

===Legal requirements of all local development documents===

Line 77:

==Criticism==

In practice, many local authorities have found Local Development Frameworks difficult to implement. Although progress on Local Development Frameworks was made in the years 2012–2015, an assessment by Nathaniel Lichfield and Partners has found any progress to be "marginal".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.kslaw.co.uk/site/library/kslaw_legal_news/why-are-local-development-frameworks-so-important|title=Why Are Local Development Frameworks So Important? - Kingsley Smith Solicitors|publisher=}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://blog.planningportal.co.uk/2015/04/09/local-plan-progress-marginal-claims-report/|title=Local plan progress ‘marginal’ claims report|first=Planning Portal Content|last=Team|date=9 April 2015|publisher=}}</ref>

==See also==