Capability Maturity Model Integration: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 03:37, 11 November 2020

Revision as of 16:31, 4 January 2021

Line 152:

|title=Standard CMMI Appraisal Method for Process Improvement (SCAMPISM) A, Version 1.2: Method Definition Document

|url=http://www.sei.cmu.edu/library/abstracts/reports/06hb002.cfm

|accessdateaccess-date=23 September 2006}}

</ref> Results of a SCAMPI appraisal may be published (if the appraised organization approves) on the CMMI Web site of the SEI: [https://sas.cmmiinstitute.com/pars/ Published SCAMPI Appraisal Results]. SCAMPI also supports the conduct of [[ISO 15504|ISO/IEC 15504]], also known as [[The SPICE project|SPICE]] (Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination), assessments etc.

Line 158:

|title=Process Maturity Profile

|url=http://www.sei.cmu.edu/cmmi/casestudies/profiles/cmmi.cfm

|accessdateaccess-date=16 February 2011}}

</ref> These statistics indicate that, since 1987, the median times to move from Level 1 to Level 2 is 23 months, and from Level 2 to Level 3 is an additional 20 months. Since the release of the CMMI, the median times to move from Level 1 to Level 2 is 5 months, with median movement to Level 3 another 21 months. These statistics are updated and published every six months in a maturity profile.{{citation needed|date=November 2013}}

Line 177:

|title=CMMI Performance Results of CMMI

|url=http://www.sei.cmu.edu/cmmi/research/results/

|accessdateaccess-date=23 September 2006}}

</ref> The median increase in performance varied between 14% (customer satisfaction) and 62% (productivity). However, the CMMI model mostly deals with ''what'' processes should be implemented, and not so much with ''how'' they can be implemented. These results do not guarantee that applying CMMI will increase performance in every organization. A small company with few resources may be less likely to benefit from CMMI; this view is supported by the [http://www.sei.cmu.edu/library/assets/2005sepCMMI.pdf process maturity profile] (page 10). Of the small organizations (<25 employees), 70.5% are assessed at level 2: Managed, while 52.8% of the organizations with 1,001–2,000 employees are rated at the highest level (5: Optimizing).

Line 236:

|format=PDF

|publisher=Carnegie Mellon University Software Engineering Institute

|accessdateaccess-date=16 February 2011

}}

*{{cite web

Line 265:

|title=SEI Partner List

|publisher=Software Engineering Institute

|accessdateaccess-date=28 October 2006

}}

*{{cite web

Line 271:

|title = Optimiza formal announcement as CMMI-L3 and published on SEI website.

|publisher = Software Engineering Institute

|accessdateaccess-date = 15 March 2011

|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20110725133632/http://sas.sei.cmu.edu/pars/pars_detail.aspx?a=16167#

|archive-date = 25 July 2011