Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Runixx info tech

Runixx info tech

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are already two versions in draft space Draft:RUNIXX INFO TECH and Draft:RUNIXX INFO TECH PVT. LTD. so no point in sending a third, almost identical version, there. In my opinion, this isn't eligible for WP:A7 as being multinational is a claim of significance. The company exists and is registered but I can't see it passing WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. A very, very new business that is potentially trying to use Wikipedia to gain exposure.

I think a deletion discussion is now required. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:54, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:54, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:54, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:55, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable company, likely a product of COI/UPE based on the "Founder" value in the infobox. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 16:00, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - there doesn't appear to be a credible claim of significance as a multinational - in my part of the world, what appears to be its website is lower down in the google search results than - and don't say you weren't warned - some guy's DeviantArt page. Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 03:37, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable, failing NCORP and GNG. Creator has been blocked for WP:LOUTSOCK, WP:PROMO and WP:DISRUPTIVE as well. Pahunkat (talk) 21:19, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]