Super
Why is "Super" not allowed in the title? Mike H. That's hot 16:04, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
- Other articles of typhoons have no "Super" in their title. HERB 02:01, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
- That didn't answer the why question at all. Mike H. That's hot 02:02, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
- If the title is to include "Super" it should do so throughout all such articles. If you want to make that change you should take up the discussion on Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Tropical cyclones. Jdorje 03:00, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
- I am not looking for an argument, I just wanted to know why, which nobody has answered yet. Mike H. That's hot 04:09, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
- I agree with you Mike the word super really should be part of the name because this really was a "super" typhoon. I was there. Jer V. 19:08, 11 August 2006(EST)
Todo
More impact. Jdorje 03:00, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
Name
Shouldn't this be called Typhoon Paka (1997) since the name wasn't retired? Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 22:06, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
- I think it's so rare to reuse names in the Central Pacific...I don't see it being a problem. It's not like the Atlantic where it's set to be reused every six years. Mike H. That's hot 05:32, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
Assessment
Considering how little there is here, I have reclassified this as stub-class. It needs more anything. --Coredesat talk. o_O 03:36, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
Todo
A lot. Try basing this off Hurricane Ioke. – Chacor 01:26, 1 December 2006 (UTC)