This sub-stub reads, "Dale Hoiberg is a sinologist and, as of 2004, the editor-in-chief of the Encyclopædia Britannica." In this case, how is notability being established, if at all? Is Wikipedia better off with or without these types of "articles"? GRider\talk 20:32, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Delete the Encyclopædia Britannica doesn't seem to have an article on him, why should we? Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 20:51, Feb 21, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. We seem to have an article on his counterpart at another semi-notable encyclopedia, Jimmy Wales. --BM 21:00, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- I disagree. Hoiberg certainly didn't found Britannica, he's just its (current?) editor-in-chief. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 21:19, Feb 21, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, just under the bar of notability - 180 Google hits. Megan1967 23:23, 22 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Keep editors of semi-notable encyclopedias. Kappa 02:31, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
- Strong Keep Editors of extremely influential encyclopaediae should be included! Just because they critique us doesn't mean we should forswear to write about them!
- Merge to the Britannica. Radiant! 09:14, Feb 23, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Deletioncruft VFD nomination.--Centauri 12:25, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)