Talk:Pole–zero plot

How bout Pole-zero plots in Continuous Time?

Mykeknauff 20:39, 14 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

as Mykeknauff said, this page is somewhat misleading as it only deals with the discrete time case.

JMatopos (talk) 08:36, 27 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

order of coefficients

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Why is it ${\displaystyle b_{0}+b_{1}s+b_{2}s^{2}}$ ? Isn't it more usual to write ${\displaystyle b_{0}s^{2}+b_{1}s+b_{2}}$ ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.167.72.124 (talk) 17:22, 4 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Would ${\displaystyle B(\beta _{m})=0}$  be more clear than ${\displaystyle B(s)|_{s=\beta _{m}}=0}$ ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.167.72.124 (talk) 17:39, 4 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Should also write it in product of zeros/poles format, like ${\displaystyle H(s)=k{\frac {\displaystyle \prod _{i=1}^{m}(s-z_{i})}{\displaystyle \prod _{i=1}^{n}(s-p_{i})}}}$  but with consistent variable names and meanings — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.167.60.72 (talk) 17:49, 4 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Example has wrong pole solution

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

s= -3+5j and s= -3-5j Chloeelsasuki (talk) 22:53, 1 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

The pole zero map is also wrong Chloeelsasuki (talk) 22:55, 1 May 2023 (UTC)Reply