Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unicode/Versions

Unicode/Versions

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Unicode/Versions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails NOTCHANGELOG. This was copied into mainspace from a draft, complete with AfC comments and tags. Author has repeatedly recreated/moved this page under different names, so there might be some satellite messes to clean up (judging from their contributions). JoelleJay (talk) 00:00, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products, Technology, and Software. JoelleJay (talk) 00:00, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Beyond clear violation of WP:NOTCHANGELOG BrigadierG (talk) 00:05, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Definitely covered by WP:NOTCHANGELOG Mason (talk) 01:36, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Clear cut violation of WP:NOTCHANGELOG Steven Walling • talk 00:33, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Just a clear violation of WP:NOTCHANGELOG. FlutterDash344 (talk) 01:35, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Nothing has changed since I declined it citing Wikipedia is not a changelog, except that the originator is continuing to be tendentious. It still violates Wikipedia is not a changelog. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:40, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fall under WP:NOT. 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 07:19, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I could see how some kind of sourced and prose-based history of the development of Unicode could plausibly be encyclopedic. This is not that. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:56, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]