Talk:Descriptive notation

Chess Unassessed

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chess, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chess on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

needs improvement

Latest comment: 18 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

I think this article needs to be improved. --Bubba73 03:32, 27 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

I agree. Improvement is needed. Isopropyl 06:10, 9 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Great! Can either of you suggest some specific improvements you'd like to see? --Malirath 23:44, 7 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

A couple of things are (1) I don't think the digram looks good, and (2) there are too many short paragraphs in the main section. Bubba73 (talk), 20:26, 24 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Well, I've worked on it, and I'm satisfied with it. Bubba73 (talk), 17:53, 14 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Evergreen example

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Well, I know this is en.wikipedia, not es.wikipedia, but I am not familiar with english descriptive notation (however, the article is about all descriptive variants). I will study it and I'll traslate it when I have time. Rjgodoy 06:49, 21 April 2007 (UTC)Reply