Talk:Procedural programming
Latest comment: 18 years ago by 24.8.163.210 in topic Comparison with object-oriented programming
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Procedural programming article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comparison with object-oriented programming
I would like to see less of the editorial slant in favor of OOP in that topic. For example, instead of using phrases like "it's undeniable that OOP is better at" please use phrases like "Many people believe that OOP is better at".
Also, I would like to see some more information about how POP can be superior to OOP. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.8.163.210 (talk) 13:37, 16 December 2006 (UTC).