Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dynamically Distributed Democracy
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Anas Salloum (talk | contribs) at 20:59, 1 July 2007 (Closing debate; result was delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 20:59, 1 July 2007 by Anas Salloum (talk | contribs) (Closing debate; result was delete)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Anas talk? 20:59, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Dynamically Distributed Democracy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Delete. Repost of a deleted article. Yellowbeard 20:12, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as {{db-repost}}, so tagged. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 20:56, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Reposting a proded article is equivalent to contesting the proposed deletion, so {{db-repost}} does not apply. Keep the AfD on the article's merits, ignore the prior deletion. Prodego talk 21:58, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- My bad, didn't know it was nuked as the result of a prod. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 23:39, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fairly obvious gibberish, Google turns up nothing helpful. Ten Pound Hammer • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 23:39, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 22:05, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete. Pavel Vozenilek 15:17, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This does not seem relevant in my option enough to warrant a full Wikipedia article. If there is something worth noting in the paper it can be referenced in the appropriate article. Electiontechnology 17:24, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Appears to be nothing but self promotion. No citations besides the minor conference papers listed. --Beaker342 06:24, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per above; nothing of relevance or value, just self promotion Elmo 21:12, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.