203.53.8.10

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by KJS77 (talk | contribs) at 03:22, 9 July 2007 (Warning: Vandalism on Just for Laughs. using TW). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Latest comment: 17 years ago by KJS77 in topic July 2007

August 2006

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to South Australia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. .Blnguyen | rant-line 05:01, 24 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. .Blnguyen | rant-line 05:04, 24 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.--Arktos talk 02:03, 30 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Nov 2006

It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Sexually transmitted disease. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. I c e d K o l a (Contributions) 04:12, 8 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Feb 2007

 

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Paul Cyr 04:53, 19 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Apr 2007

 

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Dead Poets Society, you will be blocked from editing. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Netkinetic(t/c/@) 04:32, 18 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

June 2007

Your recent edit to Fudge (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 23:33, 17 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. Your edits are unconstructive and they have been reverted. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Fudge, you will be blocked from editing. Andrew_pmk | Talk 23:54, 17 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to HTTP cookie, you will be blocked from editing. Erik Warmelink 22:37, 18 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Your recent edit to Witness (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 02:03, 19 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

 

This is your last warning for editing Levi (diff). The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. // MartinBot 02:10, 19 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Regarding edits to Less Than Jake

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, 203.53.8.10! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule photobucket\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 02:15, 19 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Peter Weir. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Wombatcat 02:16, 19 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Blocked - June 2007

 
You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

-- Merope 02:17, 19 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Ecology, you will be blocked from editing. †Sir James Paul† 01:24, 22 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

  This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Ecology, you will be blocked from editing. Andrew_pmk | Talk 01:26, 22 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Yamamoto Ichiro (山本一郎)(会話) 01:27, 22 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yamamoto Ichiro (山本一郎)(会話) 01:27, 22 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Monopoly (game), you will be blocked from editing. Ravanacker | Talk 01:40, 26 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked for a period of 48 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Anas talk? 01:44, 26 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

July 2007

 
You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for repeated vandalism. When the block expires you are free to continue editing if you intend to make useful contributions. However, if you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, this account will be subject to a longer block and action could be taken against the individual behind this IP address. bibliomaniac15 BUY NOW! 04:37, 4 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to 1900s in fashion. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Andrew_pmk | Talk 03:21, 9 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

  Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Just for Laughs, you will be blocked from editing. KJS77 03:22, 9 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.