Steward requests/Permissions

This is an archived version of this page, as edited by Andrewmackinnon~metawiki (talk | contribs) at 04:59, 31 August 2005 ([[en:User:Andrewbot]]: Wikinews bot got status). It may differ significantly from the current version.

For adminship requests on this wiki see Requests for adminship. Completed requests are archived.

Requests for permissions is a page to ask for sysop/admin or bureaucrat access to any Wikimedia wiki where no local means exist to do so yet. A steward will only give you access if your wiki has no bureaucrats (someone who can make sysops). If your wiki has a bureaucrat, please use the requests for adminship page on your own wiki instead.

You can also ask for a bot flag here.

For urgent access (to combat ongoing large-scale vandalism), you may ask on the #wikimedia or #wikimedia-tech IRC channels instead.

All requests presented here will be archived, after they are processed.


Local request pages

  • Wikipedias:

als - ar - as - be - bg - bn - ca - csb - da - de - eo - el - en - es - eu - ff - fi - fo - fr - ga - gu - he - hi - hr - hu - hy - ia - id - ie - is - iu - ja - ka - kn - ks - li - ln - lt - mg - mk - ms - mt - nds - nl - na - nn - oc - pl - pt - ro - ru - sco - scn - sa - se - simple - sk - sl - sq - sr - sv - sw - tr - ta - te - ur - uz - vi - wo - zh - zh-min-nan

  • Wiktionaries:

ang - ar - bg - ca - da - de - el - en - es - et - fa - fr - gl - gu - hi - he - hr - hu - ia - it - ja - ka - kn - la - lx - mg - nds - nl - nn - no - pl - pt - qu - ro - sc - scn - sk - sq - sr - [[wikt:sv:Wiktionary:Beg%E4ran_om_administrat%F6rsskap|sv]] - sw - tr - cy - vi - vo - zh.

  • Wikiquotes:

ang - ar - bg - cs - de - he - en - es - fa - fr - hu - is - kn - ko - ja - la - nn - pl - pt - sk - tr - (see also Other language Wikiquotes)

  • Wikibooks:

ang - ca - bg - da - de - en - fa - fr - hu - is - ja - kn - la - nl - no - pl - sr - vi - sk - tr - ro

  • Wikinews:

bg - de - es - fr - it - ja - nl - pl - pt - ro - sr - uk

Current requests for permissions

Please add information in the header for which language do you want your sysop/bureaucrat status. Please note that all adminships are subject to approval by the local community. If you are granted adminship and a complaint is later filed against you, this may be revoked immediately pending a vote (like en:WP:RFA) to ensure the community on your wiki supports your request.

Don't forget to inform your local community that you're requesting this status, and link to the appropriate request from this page. A steward will inform you when you have been made an admin/bureaucrat.


Admin for Wikipedia

am wikipedia sysop

Hi, please make am:User:Elfalem a sysop on am.wikipedia. He is currently the main active contributor, and has requested to be a sysop. In addition, the only other admin there (Codex Sinaiticus) has supported this at my talkpage on en.wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Node_ue#Amharic_wikipedia and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Node_ue#Amharic_Wikipedia .

The Amharic admin page is: am:Wikipedia:Administrators. Thanks. --Node ue 04:01, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

io wikipedia sysop

Please, make this active user io:User:Mithridates as a sysop in the Ido Wikipedia. – io:User:Artomo, current sysop in the Ido Wikipedia.

hr wikipedia bureaucrat

As current only hr bureaucrat hr:User:Denny is very rarely on wiki, and we have a need for at least some 3-4 new administrators, I would like to become a hr wikipedia bureaucrat (currently I am an administrator). Wikilink to request on hr wikipedia is: hr:Wikipedia:Prijedlozi_za_administratora#Novi_birokrat. SpeedyGonsales 09:55, 22 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hr users voted on hr:Wikipedia:Prijedlozi_za_administratora#Novi_birokrat, our bureaucrat responded, I am promoted, so this request can be archived (or deleted). SpeedyGonsales 07:41, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
have is bureaucrat--Shizhao 01:14, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

ba wikipedia bureacrat

ba:User:Rail Please, make this user a bureaucrat!

Support:

please create a local page where you can mention your request. Link it here. Thanks Anthere 08:38, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

als wikipedia bureaucrat

I (als:User:Melancholie) am one of the most active users on the Alemannic Wikipedia, and I am sysop since one year there. The only bureaucrat on als.wp isn't active any more, so I want/need to become a bureaucrat (for tasks like: als:User:Test-tools should become sysop,...) --- Greetings, Melancholie 02:46, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Further votes (if necessary): here --Melancholie 02:12, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Urdu wikipedia bureaucrat

I'm currently the only active sysop and most active contributer on Urdu Wikipedia with more then 940 edits.Please allow me bureaucrat status so that i could motivate other users also.Wisesabre 04:34, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Admin for Wikisource

ar

Hi, I am Chaos, and if the Arabic language ___domain of wikisource is ready, I would like to become an administrator/bureaucrat there.i have the same user name there , i,m trying to develop arabic Wikisource by adding the availbale historical texts and old literal texts and the Admin/Bureaucrate is necessary for protecting/deprotecting the Edited texts --Chaos 11:47, 28 August 2005 (UTC

Please make a link to your user page on ar.wikisource and a link to the page where you requestd it on Wikisource. Yann 18:36, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

de

I'm Balû 12:15, 26 August 2005 (UTC), I'm admin at de.wiktionary and would like to become bureaucrat/admin at de.wikisource. --Balû 12:15, 26 August 2005 (UTC) 22:09, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

  • support for adminship. I think one bureaucrat is enough for the starting time and Balû was relatively inactive on wikisource.org (last edit 3 May) before and still is on de.wikisource up to now. Please let the future community decide who should be further bureucrat. Anyway, Balû is working well on wiktionary, therefore he should be admin on wikisource if he wants, of course :-) --:Bdk: 13:34, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Admin for Wikibooks

ar

Hi, I am Chaos, I would like to become an administrator/bureaucrat in the Arabic Wikibooks since there is no Admin there till now .i ahve the same username there --Chaos 11:43, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

en

May I request the CheckUser flag for myself on enbooks? It would help us greatly with our attempts to stop the ongoing AP vandalism. - Aya T C 17:46, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I do not support that. There is currently a privacy policy very little respected by anyone, and supposingly, this tool is only accessible to one arbcom member and Tim. We are far from the account. So, if we change this, we must absolutely change first the privacy policy not to claim we do not do certain things that are in reality done routinely. Either way will be fine by me, but claims on our privacy policy should be respected. Aya, this is not personal, this is policy. Anthere 07:01, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This seems a little more contentious than I originially supposed. My reasoning for requesting this is, as per m:Privacy policy: Where the user has been vandalising articles or persistently behaving in a disruptive way, data may be released to assist in the targeting of IP blocks, or to assist in the formulation of a complaint to relevant Internet Service Providers. If you wish to U-turn this policy, that is fine also, and I shall withdraw my request. In the past I had been taking each case of AP vandalism (which happens quite regularly) to Brion VIBBER (or another one of the admin-dudes) who released the IP info as per this policy, but I got the impression he was getting a bit fed up with my frequent requests, so it was suggested by another one of the admin-dudes (I forget which), that I should apply for this flag. Also, I don't consider this a personal attack at all, and you are right to be concerned, since the page CheckUser seems to read more like a discussion page than a policy document, and is thus unclear as to when this flag should be granted, and under what circumstances it should be used. It might be suggested to wait until this document is more clearly defined, but since no-one is actually personally responsible for maintaining this document, it may never happen. - Aya T C 16:54, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please list examples where the privacy policy is not respected? I do not remember any cases, since the privacy policy became official, where information was given out in violation of it. -- Jeronim 08:57, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Let me explain more. Here are some bits of from the m:privacy policy which are currently of my concern :

When using a pseudonym, your IP address will not be available to the public, but it will be stored on the wiki servers for a relatively short amount of time. Thus it will be available to developers and may be released under certain circumstances (see below).

Below mentions It is the policy of Wikimedia that personally identifiable data collected in the server logs will not be released by the developers who have access to it, except as follows: In response to a valid subpoena or other compulsory request from law enforcement

  • With permission of the affected user
  • To Jimbo Wales, his legal counsel, or his designee, when necessary for investigation of abuse complaints.
  • Where the information pertains to page views generated by a spider or bot and its dissemination is necessary to illustrate or resolve technical issues.
  • Where the user has been vandalising articles or persistently behaving in a disruptive way, data may be released to assist in the targeting of IP blocks, or to assist in the formulation of a complaint to relevant Internet Service Providers
  • Where it is reasonably necessary to protect the rights, property or safety of the Wikimedia Foundation, its users or the public.

Wikimedia policy does not permit public distribution of such information under any circumstances, except as described above.

Now, the line might be between what we qualify as "public release" to "release to some editors". But I already witnessed myself one case where an ip check was made on a user who was hardly disruptive and did not qualify as vandal, he was not told an ip check was made on him, and the request was simply done by an admin. This is frankly very borderline with our privacy policy. So, I think that before giving any check user rights to ANYONE (and this include stewards as well) we must clarify what is okay to do and not okay to do and under which circonstances. Or we need to update the privacy policy to indicate ip checks may be done with very limited restrictions. If the community is okay with this, then why not, but we should not write something and do another. Please see what is currently written on the check user page as well. Anthere 09:42, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Strongly oppose. After a discussion on IRC I got the impression that Aya is misunderstanding the purpose of checkuser and is not (yet) able to handle this feature in a responsible manner. --Elian 14:58, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
You can hardly blame the misunderstanding if you take the time to read how vague the page CheckUser actually is. But since your strong opposition would imply that this page makes perfect sense to you, perhaps you wouldn't mind clarifying it for the rest of us. See also Brion's first comment on bugzilla:1 - Aya T C 00:54, 19 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Datrio agreed to make a draft of a policy under which a group of editors from one project could ask to a steward to check an editor ip. I think this could be a good solution Anthere 15:41, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps, but I can get this infomation more quickly by asking for it in #wikimedia-tech. At least one of the people in there is actually paid money to take on the responsibility for providing this information, whereas (as far as I am aware) stewards are merely volunteers and have no responsibilities at all, thus they can all go on an indefinite Wikibreak if they like. But I could be wrong. - Aya T C 01:11, 19 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Brion's is absolutely not bound to give you this information and is not paid for this task. I also trust he will give it to you only for cases of vandalism. Which is precisely the problem at stack. Brion or stewards (who are just as trusted than Brion) can at least ensure this tool is not abused and used strictly to fight vandalism. Anthere 06:58, 19 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I would only ask in cases of vandalism (this is the whole context of this thread). I don't care about sock-puppetry (which was the original, rather pathetic, reason for introducing this feature). We have far more sane ways of dealing with this, which is to judge disagreements not by the the number of "votes", but the reasoning behind said "votes". A "me-too vote" which is merely "I agree with Bob", is not weighed very highly. We never claimed to be a "direct democracy". I'm making this request to help prevent vandalism, thus your hinderences on this request encourage vandalism. I submit that this attitude makes you a vandal by proxy. - Aya T C 15:28, 19 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Aya, while the logic and reasoning about Anthere being a vandal by proxy is somewhat sound, I think it's ridiculous anyhow, and it certainly isn't helping you to accuse a member of the board of the foundation of being a vandal, even if only by proxy. --Node ue 00:24, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Admin for Wiktionary

io

Hi - Since there is not any sysop in the Ido Wiktionary I want to be one. See about my activity there in the Ido Wiktionary - io:User:Artomo, sysop in the Ido Wikipedia.

ar

Hi, I am Chaos, I would like to become an administrator/bureaucrat in the Arabic Wikitionary since there is no Admin there till now .i have the same username there --Chaos 11:44, 28 August 2005 (UTC

lv

Hello! I am User:Juzeris and I am mostly active on English Wikipedia (w:User:Juzeris) and Latvian Wikipedia (lv:User:Juzeris). I have been an admin on Latvian Wikipedia since November 2004 and have translated most of the user interface. From time to time I have been contributing also to the English Wiktionary (User:Juzeris). The community of Latvian Wikipedia is finally ready to start working on its own Latvian Wiktionary. Therefore, I kindly ask you to grant me administrator/bureaucrat status there. Thank you! --Juzeris|talk 09:28, August 22, 2005 (UTC)

Sorry for the wrong order of procedure. Now I have informed the community of Latvian Wikipedia (since there are no active users in Latvian Wiktionary to inform). If you're interested in getting the opinions of Latvian administration, the other two Latvian admins are Tail (she's a bureaucrat as well) and Feens. --Juzeris|talk 19:59, August 22, 2005 (UTC)

sl

Slovene Wiktionary start working on its own wiktionary. I'm admin on Slovene Wikipedia and I ask you to grant wikt:sl:User:Andrejj (me) administrator/bureaucrat status on Slovene Wiktionary (there are no adminis so far). See wikt:sl:Wikislovar:Administratorji. Tnx --Andrejj 14:28, 22 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Sysop status granted to Andrejj. I suppose Eleassar will be sysop as well? --Snowdog 16:50, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Tnx! Actually I thought that bureaucrat status will be also granted, so we could manage admins ourself.--Andrejj 17:06, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I would also like to ask for the admin status, for the same reason as Andrejj - so that we can manage the site ourselves as much as possible. I have been granted the sysophood on Slovenian Wikipedia and on Commons. My user page on Slovenian wiktionary: wikt:sl:User:Eleassar. Thanks very much and happy wiki-ing! --Eleassar 12:13, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You should first create a local page for request and give the opportunity to any editor to voice their support and opposition. Then link the page here. Thanks Anthere 08:40, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Admin for Wikiquote

ar

Hi, I am Chaos, I would like to become an administrator/bureaucrat in the Arabic Wikiquote since there is no Admin there till now . --Chaos 11:57, 28 August 2005 (UTC)-- :I recommend you to follow the procedure described on the above. Aphaia++ 12:55, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

sr

Currently there isn't a sysop at sr wikiquote and I'd like to become bureaucrat so I can translate the most obvious part of the interface, delete unnecessary pages and better coordinate the project keeping it alive. --Dungodung 00:39, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I should add that I'm a bureaucrat at sr wikipedia, wikinews and wikisource and known to the community as a responsible and loyal person. --Dungodung 01:40, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]


You should first create a local page for request and give the opportunity to any editor to voice their support and opposition. Then link the page here. Thanks Anthere 08:41, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the page, but I'm warning you that no one will vote unless I explicitly tell them so, because the project is largely inactive. --Dungodung 12:05, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
yes dear, but that preserve an appearance of community decision rather than steward decision (which would be bad for spirit generally). And visitors coming here do not get the idea that they just need to ask to get things. It would be too much Father Christmas type :-) Anthere 14:32, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

pt.wikiquote bureaucrat

Currently I am sysop in pt.wikiquote; the project is needing one bureaucrat. For gentility, I am needing the permission of bureaucrat.--Chico 17:13, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Admin for Wikispecies

(shouldn't apply since there's only one language, and it has a bureaucrat)

Admin for Wikinews

Removal of access

Self-de-adminship, or removal of bot flags from your bot can be requested here, and will be granted immediately. You may be asked to prove you are the same user on meta as on your local wiki first, by putting information on your talk page on your local wiki, that you're requesting de-adminship. To request the removal of sysop access from another user, please gain consensus on this on your own wiki first. All discussion must be kept on your local wiki. When it is finished and there is a community consensus to desysop a user, a trusted person from that wiki should just provide a link here to the discussion and a very brief explanation of what the results of that were.


I request for deadminship of my account Sblive at pl.Wikinews, due to my retire from all Wikimedia projects. I've already put this request message on "Przyznawanie uprawnień administratora" page at Polish Wikinews. Sblive 19:43, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

cs.wikipedia.org

Discussion here was moved to Requests for comments/Cswiki issues


meta.wikimedia.org

Discussion here was moved to Requests for comments/Cswiki issues


please gain consensus on this on your own wiki first

Requests for Bot status

To register a bot, please mention its name and the local wiki on which it will work here and make a public announcement about your intention on the local wiki and add a link to this annoucement here. The status will be given if no one will oppose your request.

Warning: for some big wikipedias, such as en:, you will need to specifically request an authorization over there. See en:Wikipedia talk:Bots for approval by a sysop and then ask for the bot flag here. Bot policy on Wiktionary (in particular en.wiktionary) is under discussion so bots should not be made without approval of the appropriate wiki. See Beer parlour.

Bot policies: de en fr simple fi nds pl ro lt (about bots, and how to get status)

Please mark fr:Utilisateur:Gpvosbot as a bot on fr.wikipedia. It is used for interwikis, mostly from nl: and la:. I requested this earlier, but inadvertently deleted my own request when requesting bot status on la:. :-) gpvos 19:18, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please mark eo:Vikipediisto:Gpvosbot as a bot on eo.wikipedia. It is used for all kinds of things. gpvos 19:22, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please also mark ca:RobotQuistnix as a bot on the ca: Wikipedia. -- ca:Joanjoc, catalan administrator 28 August 2005 (UTC)

Please mark li:RobotQuistnix as a bot on the li: Wikipedia. -- Quistnix 20:59, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please grant bot status for ru:Участник:BotInok in russian wikipedia. Лий 22:29, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please mark ru:Участник:Mr. Bot as bot in russian wikipedia. Maxim Razin 07:38, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

on Bot pour les pays i have call to have a bot for country, than i have create the user StéBot@wikipédia-fr.

Thanks in advance to permit it Sté ~ 22 août 2005 à 10:02 (CEST)


JaroslavleffBot

Please grant bot status in the Russian wiki (ru.wikipedia.org) - ru:User:JaroslavleffBot. --Jaroslavleff 10:45, 21 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Datrio 09:38, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

YurikBot

Please grant bot status to the following (i already have bot status on most major sites):

ang, ar, br, bs, chr, cy, fo, ga, got, gu, hi, io, is, ka, ku, kw, lb, li, lo, lv, mg, mi, mk, ms, na, nah, nds, rm, sa, scn, sco, se, sl, sq, tl, uk, ur, yi, zh-min-nan

--Yurik 05:53, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Chobot

All requests put in one place, Datrio 08:18, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

CyeZBot

AgentSpartiBot

Please grant Bot status to de:Benutzer:AgentSpartiBot for de. -- de:Benutzer:Sparti 12:38, 8 August 2005 (UTC)

Please announce this on a local request page. Datrio 10:41, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

PalicaBOT

I would like to request a bot status for users it:User:PalicaBOT, he:User:PalicaBOT. Request on local pages are here it:User_talk:PalicaBOT, he:User_talk:PalicaBOT. Thank you in advance. --Palica 08:24, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

can I have bot status on sc.wiki for CruccoBot, on scn.wiki for scn:User:CruccoBot and on fur.wiki for fur:Utent:CruccoBot --Cruccone 11:29, 19 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to request bot status for NyenyecBot in the Hungarian Wikipedia. It will fix common spelling errors and do other non-interwiki related automated tasks. I announced it in HuWiki at the Village Pump in Huwiki.

Thanks, Nyenyec 00:25, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to request bot status for en:User:Andrewbot and wikinews:en:User:Andrewbot. It will fix spelling errors (attended), double redirects (unattended), and other maintenance tasks. Thanks, Andrewmackinnon 02:03, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Support a usefull bot, doing a very needed job --Cspurrier 02:05, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support, an invaluable bot which does a fantastic job. (I hadn't seen this when I made the request below, sorry.} Dan100 07:45, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Note: the Wikinews bot has got bot status. See Special:Log/rights. Andrewmackinnon 04:59, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please also grant SpaceBirdyBot bot status on the icelandic wiktionary, many thanks in advance (local request), greetings --birdy (:> )=| 19:51, 19 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please give bot status to my bot (bg:User:Santa) (contribs) on Bulgarian wikipedia. Thanks, DCLXVI 01:52, 18 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ongoing discussion is here: bg:Уикипедия:Разговори#Бот. Please wait for it to finish. --Glimz 18:56, August 22, 2005 (UTC)

Hi, I need bot status on wikipedia:pl agreement discussion here. Thanks, Leonardo Gregianin 11:11, 19 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I would like to ask for the bot flag for my bot, LoquBot on wikipedia:es. The local agreement discussion is here. Thanks. Loqu 21:28, 22 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I would like to know if there is any trouble with the bot flag I asked for, it's been one week since then and the agreement discussion on the local wikipedia is getting so old that it will be archived soon. Thanks. Loqu 15:25, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please, give bot status to gl:User:NTBot at the galician wikipedia. Agreement discussion is here. Thanks. Nuno Tavares 12:18, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to have a bot flag for wikispecies:User:UcuchaBot. See Wikispecies:Village Pump#Bot. Ucucha 12:23, 23 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Lzur

Please mark pl:Wikipedysta:Lzur. Bot as bot in polish wikipedia. Warning:

  1. I'm Admin in Polish Wikipedia
  2. I need this only for 1-2 days
  3. I need this only for temporary proxy blocking. See [1] and Proxy blocking.

This bot is made for creating/updating french cities articles. Agreement discussion is here : [2]

[[User:Jef-Infojef] 20:02, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

For Wikisource. The bot will assist me in uploading large texts that are scattered across a number of pages like The Rig Veda. I am using a variety of tools but the actual upload portion is done with a modified pywikipediabot. (local discussion) --CSN

Do I get notification somewhere when this goes through? Is it going to take long? If this process doesn't move along, I'm just going to start running the bot on my main account. What is the holdup? --CSN
Hi CSN,
Create a page for bot on Wikisource if it doesn't exist yet. Then I can give you bot status if there is no opposition. Yann 18:32, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Lt-wiki-bot

Asking for bot status for fr:User:Lt-wiki-bot (reqest is made on fr:Discussion Wikipédia:Bot before 10 days and noone disaproved) and ru:User:Lt-wiki-bot (local bureaucrat ru:User:Maximaximax asked to request bot status). Bot only runs interwiki.py (it already has bot status on English and Lithuanian Wikipedias. Knutux 07:58, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can this double-redirect fixer bot be given a bot flag on en.wikinews.org? The only objection raised was it "spamming" RC, ie that it hasn't been flagged. This bot would be a godsend for us... Dan100 15:37, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting bot status for Solbot. Bot will fix common spelling/grammar errors, and help categorizing. Announced on Solbot. Thanks.
Solensean 21:34, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]


KnightRider

Add bot flag to es:KnightRider in es wikipedia, thanks.

Requests for name changes

If your wiki has no local bureaucrat, you can request your username be changed on this page. Only users with less than 5000 edits (edit counter) can be renamed. Please check if your new name doesn't exist yet on the local wiki (Special:Listusers). Edit your talk page of the wiki on which you want to change your name. State which name you want to change to. Sign it with ~~~~.

Please remember to leave a note if you have sysop, bureaucrat or bot status on the wiki in question, so a steward will move it along with your account.

Current name-change requests

I'd like to be able to use the accounts "Eskimo" on it: & en: wikipedias. Both are unused (no contribs, I sent email to owners of the 2 accounts, no answers). I currently have the user name "Eskimoo" on these wikipedias. Could you rename/delete the unused accounts and rename "Eskimoo" to "Eskimo" ? (I think people are supposed to have 1 account only) Thanks. --Eskimo 07:41, 25 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Current temporary sysops for emergency or technical purposes

Urdu Wikipedia

I want to translate my URDU wikipedia,the current sysop seems to be inactive
reference : 'To translate the interface you must edit the pages in the MediaWiki namespace. These pages can only be edited by sysops. You might need someone with sysop status very soon. Add your request on Requests for permissions.' [3]

What's your username on this Wikipedia? Datrio 15:17, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
My user name is WiseSabre .i need to edit interface,if i can do it with sysop rights then give me that, otherwise not
Wisesabre 10:30, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I'm granting you temporary sysop rights for a week to translate the interface. Please post a message on the wiki in your local language that you've become a sysop for that, and leave a link to this page (ie. [[m:Requests for permissions#Urdu wikipedia]]). Datrio 11:20, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Granted permanent status. Datrio 12:17, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Malayalam Wikipedia

Hindi Wiktionary

Okay, that was longer than 24 hours ;). Desysopped. Datrio 08:28, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

See also