Should this article's title be lowercased to Document object model? Yes, I know it's a moot point once Wikipedia implements case-insensitivity, but until then... --Damian Yerrick
I don't think so, the W3.org on DOM page has Document Object Model. -- HJH
Some more things concerning the DOM can probably be mentioned in the article, for instance the fact that it is not only used in web-browsers but also for xml processing in other applications. A summary about the different levels of the DOM and what purpose they serve could also be helpful in my opinion. Also some links to implementations and libraries that are based on the DOM could be a good entry point for people reading this and being more interested in practical DOM. I never contributed to Wiki projects due to general lack of time, maybe I'll eventually get it going here. -- _tc
W3C Recommendations
Could anybody explain what is "W3C Recommendation"? Is there any difference between some Level 3 specification which is included in W3C Recommendation and which is not?
W3C DOM
The article so far discouraged the use of the DOM giving the reason that browser support is not sufficient (including some Microsoft bashing). However nowadays the situation is fairly stable and many methods of the W3CDOM may be used without problems in a cross-browser way. I have added thow that it is a good practice to test first for the availabilty certain DOM-API functions. Hirzel 09:31, 20 August 2005 (UTC)