Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Dstern1

Dstern1

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch Filed: 23:45, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

• Dstern1 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Rosebud999 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Sarahsposse (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• Code letter: G)

• Supporting evidence: Dstern1 (talk · contribs) has repeatedly argued to include controversial details about the birth of one of Sarah Palin's children, an action that has repeatedly failed to gain consensus. See Talk:Sarah Palin#Trig's Birth for the latest iteration. The latter two accounts, Rosebud999 (talk · contribs) and Sarahsposse (talk · contribs), have been newly created in the course of this conversation, and their sole purpose is apparently to argue for inclusion of the disputed information. Kelly ^hi! 23:45, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  See also Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Dstern1. Kelly ^hi! 03:48, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  Just glancing at User:Rosebud999, I notice that account uses "new section" when editing the immediately preceding section for their fifth edit. Likewise, User:Sarahposse uses "format correction" for their third edit. User:Dstern1 uses both quite frequently, as well: [1], [2]. Not conclusive, but the nexus seems remarkably coincidental given their wp:spa nature and identical positions.   user:j    (aka justen)   03:56, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  Confirmed - all of the above - Alison ^❤ 04:14, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  Clerk note: All already blocked. Tiptoety ^talk 04:50, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]