Talk:Stewards/Confirm/2023

This is an archived version of this page, as edited by DerHexer (talk | contribs) at 20:10, 1 March 2023 (All stewards running for confirmation: add). It may differ significantly from the current version.

Latest comment: 2 years ago by DerHexer in topic All stewards running for confirmation
This page allows for general discussion and questions regarding the 2023 steward confirmations.

Final decisions (by stewards)

Confirmation discussions will remain open from 28 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC) till 07 March 2023, 21:00 (UTC). This may be extended to two weeks for one or more confirmations at the discretion of the Election Committee if the committee believes further input is required before concluding. The Election Committee will close these discussions and implement the outcome (which also means making a decision in non-obvious cases).

This page is for steward discussion only. Please do not comment in this box unless you are a steward.

The summaries below provide a very strict overview of the most relevant confirmation comments.

Stewards: Please leave your comments right below the boxes after reviewing the actual confirmation comments and your understanding of relevant policies. You may summarize the confirmation discussions in individual comments, but no overall summary is given.

Status Candidate Notes
   Resigned
-revi Did not run for reconfirmation
   Under discussion
AmandaNP
   Under discussion
AntiCompositeNumber
   Under discussion
Base
   Under discussion
BRPever
   Under discussion
Bsadowski1
   Resigned
Cromium Did not run for reconfirmation
   Under discussion
DerHexer
   Under discussion
Elton
   Under discussion
HakanIST
   Under discussion
Hasley
   Under discussion
Hoo man
   Under discussion
Jon Kolbert
   Resigned
Linedwell Did not run for reconfirmation
   Under discussion
MarcGarver
   Under discussion
MarcoAurelio
   Under discussion
Martin Urbanec
   Under discussion
Masti
   Resigned
MusikAnimal Did not run for reconfirmation
   Under discussion
Operator873
   Under discussion
RadiX
   Resigned
Ruslik0 Resigned during confirmations
   Under discussion
Sakretsu
   Under discussion
Schniggendiller
   Under discussion
Sotiale
   Under discussion
Stanglavine
   Under discussion
Stryn
   Under discussion
Tegel
   Under discussion
Teles
   Resigned
TheresNoTime Resigned during confirmations
   Under discussion
Tks4Fish
   Resigned
Trijnstel Did not run for reconfirmation
   Under discussion
Vermont
   Under discussion
Vituzzu
   Under discussion
Wiki13
   Under discussion
Wim b
   Under discussion
علاء
Results

AmandaNP

  Keep: 100 (active / helpful / polite / no comments)
  Remove: 2 (low cross wiki activity )

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 20:05, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

AntiCompositeNumber

  Keep: 92 (helpful / competent / good working / helps with SRG backlog / no comments)
  Remove: 1 (bad handling of the Rodhullandemu case)

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 20:05, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Base

  Keep: 84 (dedicated / helpful / helps many communities / no comments)
  Remove: 1 (does not support RfP by newbies at home wiki)

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 20:05, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

BRPever

  Keep: 76 (helpful / active / competent / trusted / no comments)
  Remove: 0

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 20:05, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Bsadowski1

  Keep: 75 (helpful / good locks / friendly / no comments)
  Remove: 0

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 20:05, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

DerHexer

  Keep: 99 (key work in background / not satisfied with username global locks / no comments)
  Remove: 1 (no work outside of Meta)

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 20:05, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Elton

  Keep: 52 (quality steward / helpful / no comments)
  Remove: 0

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 20:05, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

HakanIST

  Keep: 72 (experienced / hope to help more communities / no comments)
  Remove: 1 (no reason)

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 20:05, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hasley

  Keep: 78 (helpful / clears SRG backlog / quick locks / no comments)
  Remove: 0

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 20:05, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hoo man

  Keep: 62 (long-term steward / activity improved / no comments)
  Remove: 0

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 20:05, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Jon Kolbert

  Keep: 58 (enforces NOP / combats spammers / no comments)
  Remove: 1 (bad handling of the Rodhullandemu case)

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 20:05, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

MarcGarver

  Keep: 51 (minor issues on Wikibooks / no comments)
  Remove: 0

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 20:05, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

MarcoAurelio

  Keep: 83 (competent / active / nice answers / no comments)
  Remove: 0

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 20:05, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Martin Urbanec

  Keep: 106 (helpful / kind / calm / no comments)
  Remove: 0

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 20:05, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Masti

  Keep: 70 (trusted / no comments)
  Remove: 0

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 20:05, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Operator873

  Keep: 74 (helpful / competent / no comments)
  Remove: 1 (removed a SE2023 question)

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 20:05, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

RadiX

  Keep: 56 (helpful / no comments)
  Remove: 0

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 20:05, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Sakretsu

  Keep: 67 (active / no comments)
  Remove: 0

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 20:05, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Schniggendiller

  Keep: 66 (lower activity / no comments)
  Remove: 0

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 20:05, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Sotiale

  Keep: 88 (helps with SRCU / trusted / active / helpful / competent / no comments)
  Remove: 0

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 20:05, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Stanglavine

  Keep: 55 (helped with AAR / suffiicent activity / helpful / no comments)
  Remove: 0

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 20:05, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Stryn

  Keep: 64 (sufficient activity / no comments)
  Remove: 0

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 20:05, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Tegel

  Keep: 62 (helpful / no comments)
  Remove: 0

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 20:05, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Teles

  Keep: 56 (helpful / trusted / quick to spot LTAs / no comments)
  Remove: 0

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 20:05, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Tks4Fish

  Keep: 64 (trustworthy / competent / no comments)
  Remove: 2 (makes too many of global blocks)
  Neutral: 2 (poor responses to meta talk page posts)

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 20:05, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Vermont

  Keep: 88 (kind / competent / decisive / willing to make tought calls / helpful in discussions / no comments)
  Remove: 1 (removed a SE2023 question)

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 20:05, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Vituzzu

  Keep: 74 + 1 weeak keep (brief statement / no comments)
  Remove: 2 (not talkative / no reason given)

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 20:05, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Wiki13

  Keep: 55 (good steward / active / no comments)
  Remove: 0

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 20:05, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Wim b

  Keep: 59 (good actions / no comments)
  Remove: 0

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 20:05, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

علاء

  Keep: 80 (kind /helpful / no comments)
  Remove: 0

Note
You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 20:05, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

All stewards running for confirmation

Note
Should you be decided to drop your comment here, please don't forget to add Confirm all or Remove all to your text. The discussion below applies to all stewards listed in the sections above, except the one commenting. Thanks, --Martin Urbanec (talk) 20:05, 28 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
Return to "Stewards/Confirm/2023" page.