Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knight Entertainment

Knight Entertainment

mirror of Knight entertainment, NN DVD manufacturer Flapdragon 03:27, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

See also votes and comments at Knight entertainment, cited above. Flapdragon 03:30, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete other mirror site. The 'e' in title was not to be lower case. Also Delete User RCKNIGHT as it was my first atempt to create profile and I did not realize that it was case senitive. Rcknight profile matched my user log in.

Do Not DeleteI have edited site to not show releases, or up comming release to aid in any issues with this article.

Other entries on Newgrounds such as Star Syndicate are allowed Wikipedia articles, then why not a DVD prodcution that features a animation of Newgrounds Mascot, or another series like Dr. Shroud? --Rcknight 04:56, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, advertising. User:Zoe|^(talk) 04:59, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Do Not Delete There is no advertising, it is factual in nature only. You allow other flash series found on newgrounds like Neurotically Yours Please how mine is differnt?--Rcknight 05:03, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You aso have the flash series found on Newgrounds known as Salad Fingers How is this not advertisment like mine?--Rcknight 05:05, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Also the mascot of Newgrounds the character Pico (Newgrounds.com) is on the Dr. shroud DVD production, and is a cartoon found on Newgrounds here - [1]. This character is worthy of his own article, when he has only appeared on a few flash entries, but the production and production company that contributes more to this character is not allowed to exist? These are facts presented on my article that directly relate to and go in conjunction with existing approved articles.--Rcknight 05:10, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Another Flash found on Newgrounds allowed to have an article Xombie--Rcknight 05:12, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Alien Hominid a creation of Tom Fulp ,like Pico feature on the Dr. Shroud DVD. Now tell me how this is an approved article, and not advertisement in comparrison to the current state of this article? If this article is in violation, then should every article that is related to a manufacture product that can be bought or sold.--Rcknight 06:01, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The character Pico (Newgrounds.com) is on the Dr. Shroud DVD production and is another fact that realted to other exisinting approved articles.--Rcknight 06:04, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Alien Hominid is a single production made by a new company and it is an accepted article. This particle has a production that is Newgrounds Related, as well as related to other articles. Also several more productions are in the works set to be released in 2006. FFC alone has 4 to 6 releases a year and is similar to otehr Mixed Martial Arts entries. Information added to this article will also be added to related articles. Several Flash Animated series do not even have DVd productions are allowed to have articles.--Rcknight 15:32, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

- I agree with the former writer.  This is no reason to consider this entry for deletion. Nsight7
Above comment by anon 70.112.39.83 --Aquillion 06:26, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Above comment pasted over from previous debate on other mirror site to be deleted. --Rcknight 15:53, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
[reply]

Delete NN site, sock support —Wahoofive (talk) 16:28, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. - Dalbury 16:45, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --JJay 17:36, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Do Not DeleteThis Article Does Not Promote Nor Does It Advertise. It Is Factual In Nature Only and is similar to Articles listed above. No one who has taken the side of deletion has explained how this is and advertisement and the others are not. Also, there has been not supproting evidence as to why they feel this site varies from the others that have been listed above and are approved.--Rcknight 17:41, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete ad. (Don't see any socks here, though, just lots of votes from the article's author.) AndyJones 18:47, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Do Not Delete I just made it late yeasterday, and I have yet to tell anyone about it due to the deletion ststus. I have yet to have anyone give me compelling reson why my article should not be allowed when some of the articles I have mentioned above are allowed? Most of the flash series you allow are just web sites. Knight Entertainment not only works with several differnt clients, more will be added upon the release of the 6 other projects currently in works. Those 6 were not listed because they are not a matter of fact until then. I also do not want to get accused of "promoting" them.

Give me a reason why the above articles were allowed to exist? If my site is an advertisement (I do not post any links to where to buy the DVD by the way. It is listed on over 30 web stores.) then the articles listed in my earlier comments are advertisments for their web sites. If there is no "stock" here, then why is there stock in articles that explain about web pages based on flash animation series? No one has dared to explain that to me. I have just as much stock if not more with an actual product.--Rcknight 20:23, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The reason is that (as explained before) the subject of the article is not notable (NN). By the way your objection has been registered, there's no need to keep voting again and again. Flapdragon 20:38, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

So just making a web page is notable. (As in the examples I listed above.) But taking something in cyber space, and taking it to market in association with a variety of those notable web pages is not notable. I fail to see tha logic. Other DVD production are noted, and other flash series are noted, then why is a flash series taken to the DVD not notable? Of the 100's of flash animation, only 8 have made it to the DVD market. I am helping more to faciliate that need.