RU Low
November 2005
- KURT ANGLE (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) all edits by this user consist of vandalism. vandalized a user page and keeps adding "wanker" and "gay" to everything. --Phil 16:37, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
- Etyheryery (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) I wouldn't quite call him a vandal, but something about the guy just rubs me the wrong way--Etyheryery 03:47, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
- Remington and the Rattlesnakes (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) has been adding references to Luxembourg to Liberal Elite, adding a Redneck section to Mississippi and altering the Luann (disambiguation) page to describe the comic as "liberal".--TheGrza 03:43, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
I am not a vandal and you know it. Remington and the Rattlesnakes 03:46, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
- Nestore (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) just adding sillyness to Berlin, and elsewhere (see [image:Donkey2.JPG]. I have to go, and can't really monitor it any more.Smmurphy 16:39, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
- Mdwwayment (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) (alt: 69.161.239.165 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)) Various bizarre pages, ie F-35 name list VF-96 66th air force unit and dozens of random pictures (which I'd say the copyright of is questionable despite how they're marked). While I'm not sure if my choice of listing them for a speedy delete is the best option or not, I definitely know that the user removing the speedy delete tag from the 66th air force unit themself after being warned about it is not. Indium 00:47, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
- Alexhayden (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) vandalised Agent X twice in the past hour, only two contribs (possible sock?) - SoM 16:47, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
- WAS (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)consistantly placing inappropriate comments in articles, warned numerous times. Arniep 17:25, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
- Kobiyashi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) s/he is removing the foreign character template from a lot of articles. Similar vandalism occured yesterday.--Carabinieri 22:41, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
- Jayjg (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) RfC procedures state: "All signed comments and talk not related to a vote or endorsement, should be directed to this page's discussion page. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page." Jayjg engages in a revert war on an RfC against me (one that he certified/endorsed), reinserting threaded comments in direct violation of RfC procedures. 19:40, 2 November 2005 17:55, 3 November 2005 14:59, 3 November 2005. As it happens, that last edit shows Jayjg removing my endorsement of an outside comment to the talk page. This qualifies as vandalism.. Now, Jayjg claims on my talk page that he thought my post was just another threaded comment. If it was, then it is interesting that the other two times he reverted me, he reinserted threaded comments to the article against RfC procedures. [1] [2]. But the one and only time he removes what he says he thought was a "threaded comment" was when it was my comment. And my comment also happens to be an endorsement of an outside comment by Vizcarra, and messing with someone's vote qualifies as vandalism. Note the endorsement he removed starts with an objection to a point I don't agree with, and ends with "I endorse your statement otherwise". That Jayjg is an admin and a member of the arbitration committee means that ignorance is no excuse. He knows policy. He knew exactly what he was doing. What will be interesting will be whether the fact that he is an admin and a member of arbcom has any bearing on whether policy is enforced neutrally, fairly, and evenly here, or whether who you are somehow affects judgment on what you do. He engaged in an edit war, disrupted RfC procedures, and vandalized my vote/endorsement of an outside comment. For a complete description of everything that happened, see this. FuelWagon 04:05, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
- Radiojon (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) keeps blanking a live talk page at Talk:Rootkit and moving it to Talk:Rootkit/Archive here and here even while the page is being used. He is blanking my comments. Also removes redirect from Rootkit, which he has put a bizarre speedy on as well. He is creating a mess andf then reverting to it, making the pages unusable. Has been warned, SqueakBox 17:47, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
- DarkEyed (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) vandalizing Oklahoma Christian University with hateful nonsense. Danlovejoy 04:34, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
- Yelarekardondayo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) writes weird articles. Maybe it's not vandalism, but there have been one warning so delte this if it is rong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2005-11-01 16:44:00 (talk • contribs)
October 2005
Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Repeated_wholesale_removal_of_info_from_St._Volodymyr.27s_Cathedral --Irpen 21:55, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
- If it's reported at administrators' noticeboard, why did you need to report it here? Also, why did you not follow the procedure at the top of the page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2005-10-31 22:52:54 (talk • contribs)