Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hypothesis-based modelling
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:21, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Dear all, Thank you for your comments. The present article is work in progress. Indeed this is a unpublished article, that we are planning to transform to talk about hypothesis based modelling. Presumably, the experimental part will be reduced to a simple example and we will elaborate more on the actual method. Again, this is work in progress, and the authors are using the ease of wikipedia to do the editing work. Is there a way for us to work on wikipedia, while changes are not seen by users (a bit like the sand box mode)? maybe this would be best, then when we are ready, we can republish.Kuikuisven (talk) 07:39, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Hypothesis-based modelling (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This is not an encyclopedia article. In fact it isn't even about hypothesis-based modeling. It is a research paper (apparently unpublished) about hormone physiology that uses the technique. Therefore it is WP:OR and doesn't belong on Wikipedia. Looie496 (talk) 17:57, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:42, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete. Wikipedia is not for publishing original research. The author will have to publish his or her work elsewhere. Kotiwalo (talk) 15:54, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete it about a particular model for insulin secretion, not the general subject, but it is OR -- or possibly copyvio DGG (talk) 17:14, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete contents orthogonal to title. Bigdaddy1981 (talk) 00:08, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.