Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Off The Chart Radio
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Freakofnurture (talk | contribs) at 17:36, 21 December 2005 (subst:). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 17:36, 21 December 2005 by Freakofnurture (talk | contribs) (subst:)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was respectfully deleted. -Mysekurity(have you seen this?) 22:14, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
If it isn't ham, it's... JHMM13 (T | C) 18:30, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, I was going to do more to this page when i had the chance. I'm new to Wikipedia so i'm sorry if i've done something wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.106.246.110 (talk) 18:37, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- No problem Ian13 18:38, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy as spam. Ian13 18:38, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Ok. i've updated the page to contain more than just a link to the website.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.106.246.110 (talk) 19:08, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The major problem with your article is that you fail to say why Off the Chart Radio is notable in any way. You launch into a month by month history of a year old station but fail to tell us why we should care at all about it, the reader doesn't have any reason to keep reading unless they are pretty big fans of the station already (and they'd have to be big fans to want to deal with this kind of detail). Provided that the station is notable (verified through third parties, news articles, people outside of its broadcast area talking about it), you would need to clean up this article. I'd suggest a discussion of the format, the broadcast area, it's audience, then some of the shows. If you want to talk about the history, unless a lot of interesting things are happening (which it doesn't seem) it can be summed up in a few paragraphs (when it started and why, and then what it's up to today). DeathThoreau 17:20, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This AfD debate is being relisted in order to prompt a more thorough consensus. Please place new discussion below this line. → Ξxtreme Unction {yakłblah} 14:52, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- ...green eggs. Delete. — FREAK OF NURxTURE (TALK) 16:43, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - seems non-notable to me. --Cyde Weys talkcontribs 20:27, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.