Wikipedia:Historical archive/Logs/Offline reports/Should this be a stub?

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Markalex (talk | contribs) at 17:55, 18 June 2004 (O: removed fixed entries). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Overview

The list below shows short pages in the main english article namespace (100 characters or less) that are not marked as being stubs and are not redirect or disambiguation pages. It was generated on 11th June 2004 from the 10th June 2004 database dump.

Preamble

Articles which need expanding should be marked as stubs by adding {{msg:stub}} to them. If the article genuinely does cover everything there is to say on a subject then perhaps it is a dictionary definition which should be moved to Wiktionary, or it might be better merged with whatever links there.

Regenerating this report

This report is generated from a Link Analysis Database using the SQL:

select concat( '*[[', art_title, ']] (', art_len, ' bytes)' ) 
from art 
where art_len < 100 
and art_len > 0 
and art_is_stub = 0
and art_is_redirect = 0
and art_is_disambig = 0
order by art_title;

The output needs to be split into sub-sections by hand

Suggested improvements

  • Show only articles between 100 and 250 characters length? - TB 09:38, Jun 9, 2004 (UTC)

List

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

L

M


N

O

P


R

S

T

U

V