Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guitar Programming

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Nagle (talk | contribs) at 16:15, 23 April 2006 (Fixed indentation.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WP:NOR Original research, self-posted Please read WP:NOR to understand why this is unsuitable for Wikipedia. Thanks. --John Nagle 08:06, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • This is an article about a college research project and there is no reason it should be removed. He thought I was the "Nick Ireland" in the article when it auctually reads "Nick Irelan" and talks about a computer science student (I am not a student of any kind). John dosen't even really read the articles he only skims through to find what could possibly be the slightest problem then asks that they be deleted in order to gain attention. I don't know him or have anything against him I just think he was mistaken about who I am.
  • Keep It They are definatly notable when they affect a billion dollar industry. Google began as a college resaerch project. Think about how different the world would be if it was simply dismissed as not being noteable because its was a college project. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nirelan (talkcontribs)
    • Nobody is dismissing anything. The problem is that Wikipedia is here to describe things that are notable, not things that might be notable one day. We don't know which of today's research projects will change the world like Google did: therefore we don't write about any of them until after they've changed the world. — Haeleth Talk 11:51, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as original research unless references are found. Feezo (Talk) 09:29, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • What refrences do you want? I linked to the blog. - Nirelan
Blogs are not considered a reliable source under Wikipedia guidelines. Please see the link for more information on the subject. Feezo (Talk) 10:04, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]