Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiddush club (2nd nomination)

Question: Why wasn't the original contributor informed of this vote? It's now on his talk page, see User talk:Nathanm777.

I am not taking a position yet as to whether this article should stay or go, but if it stays it should be moved to Kiddush club since it is not a formal organization. --Metropolitan90 08:44, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand, it is a definite widely known activity, so much so that it merits its own mention on the Orthodox Union's website (they're against it), see the external link on the article. IZAK 11:36, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per IZAK (and Jayjg who voted only once to keep them all). More I think this vote is some kind of misuse of wikiprodedure to prevent debate where they have to take place. Alithien 12:10, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep and move what on earth?? why is this back on AfD after two days? "Kiddush club" is a real phenomenon and social issue. It may be kinda minor, but then we're not paper. What's the nomination to deletion here, anyway? - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 12:13, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with kiddush. Fringe phenomenon, notability not established. JFW | T@lk 14:03, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per IZAK. It is only vaguely related to kiddush and is much more a social phenomenon than a religious one, analagous to a "coffee klatch" -- Avi 15:00, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, and absolutely DO NOT merge with kiddush. --DLand ^TALK 15:08, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]